linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v3.18.124

PCI: pciehp: Request control of native hotplug only if supported

2018-08-09T10:20:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 408fec36a1ab3d14273c2116b449ef1e9be3cb8b ]

Currently we request control of native PCIe hotplug unconditionally.
Native PCIe hotplug events are handled by the pciehp driver, and if it is
not enabled those events will be lost.

Request control of native PCIe hotplug only if the pciehp driver is
enabled, so we will actually handle native PCIe hotplug events.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas 
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg 
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas 
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: acpi: acpica: fix acpi operand cache leak in nseval.c

2018-05-30T05:47:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 97f3c0a4b0579b646b6b10ae5a3d59f0441cc12c ]

I found an ACPI cache leak in ACPI early termination and boot continuing case.

When early termination occurs due to malicious ACPI table, Linux kernel
terminates ACPI function and continues to boot process. While kernel terminates
ACPI function, kmem_cache_destroy() reports Acpi-Operand cache leak.

Boot log of ACPI operand cache leak is as follows:
>[    0.464168] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
>[    0.467022] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
>[    0.469376] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
>[    0.471647] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
>[    0.477997] ACPI Error: Null stack entry at ffff880215c0aad8 (20170303/exresop-174)
>[    0.482706] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, While resolving operands for [opcode_name unavailable] (20170303/dswexec-461)
>[    0.487503] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\DBG] (Node ffff88021710ab40), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.492136] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB._INI] (Node ffff88021710a618), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.497683] ACPI: Interpreter enabled
>[    0.499385] ACPI: (supports S0)
>[    0.501151] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
>[    0.503342] ACPI Error: Null stack entry at ffff880215c0aad8 (20170303/exresop-174)
>[    0.506522] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, While resolving operands for [opcode_name unavailable] (20170303/dswexec-461)
>[    0.510463] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\DBG] (Node ffff88021710ab40), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.514477] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_PIC] (Node ffff88021710ab18), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.518867] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, Evaluating _PIC (20170303/bus-991)
>[    0.522384] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Operand: Slab cache still has objects
>[    0.524597] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5 #26
>[    0.526795] Hardware name: innotek gmb_h virtual_box/virtual_box, BIOS virtual_box 12/01/2006
>[    0.529668] Call Trace:
>[    0.530811]  ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
>[    0.532240]  ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
>[    0.533905]  ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
>[    0.535497]  ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x3f/0x7b
>[    0.537237]  ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
>[    0.538701]  ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
>[    0.540008]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
>[    0.541593]  ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
>[    0.543008]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x19e/0x21f
>[    0.546202]  ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
>[    0.547513]  ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
>[    0.548817]  ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
>[    0.550587] vgaarb: loaded
>[    0.551716] EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
>[    0.553744] PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>[    0.555038] PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> ... Continue to boot and log is omitted ...

I analyzed this memory leak in detail and found acpi_ns_evaluate() function
only removes Info->return_object in AE_CTRL_RETURN_VALUE case. But, when errors
occur, the status value is not AE_CTRL_RETURN_VALUE, and Info->return_object is
also not null. Therefore, this causes acpi operand memory leak.

This cache leak causes a security threat because an old kernel (<= 4.9) shows
memory locations of kernel functions in stack dump. Some malicious users
could use this information to neutralize kernel ASLR.

I made a patch to fix ACPI operand cache leak.

Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han 
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Events: add a return on failure from acpi_hw_register_read

2018-05-30T05:47:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit b4c0de312613ca676db5bd7e696a44b56795612a ]

This ensures that acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect() does not use fixed_status
and and fixed_enable as uninitialized variables.

Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: acpi_pad: Fix memory leak in power saving threads

2018-05-30T05:47:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8b29d29abc484d638213dd79a18a95ae7e5bb402 ]

Fix once per second (round_robin_time) memory leak of about 1 KB in
each acpi_pad kernel idling thread that is activated.

Found by testing with kmemleak.

Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: processor_perflib: Do not send _PPC change notification if not ready

2018-05-30T05:47:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit ba1edb9a5125a617d612f98eead14b9b84e75c3a ]

The following warning was triggered after resumed from S3 -
if all the nonboot CPUs were put offline before suspend:

[ 1840.329515] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771 at rIP: 0xffffffff86061e3a (native_read_msr+0xa/0x30)
[ 1840.329516] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329521]  __rdmsr_on_cpu+0x33/0x50
[ 1840.329525]  generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329527]  smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329530]  ? acpi_ds_result_pop+0xdd/0xf2
[ 1840.329532]  ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329534]  rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329536]  ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329538]  ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329541]  intel_pstate_update_perf_limits+0xf3/0x220
[ 1840.329544]  ? notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
[ 1840.329546]  intel_pstate_set_policy+0x4e/0x150
[ 1840.329548]  cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329550]  cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329552]  ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329556]  acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329558]  acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329561]  acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329563]  acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329565]  process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329567]  worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329569]  kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329571]  ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329572]  ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329575]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329577]  ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[ 1840.329585] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x774 (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) at rIP: 0xffffffff86061f78 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
[ 1840.329586] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329587]  __wrmsr_on_cpu+0x37/0x40
[ 1840.329589]  generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329592]  smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329594]  ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329595]  ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329597]  wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329598]  ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329599]  ? wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329602]  intel_pstate_hwp_set+0xd3/0x150
[ 1840.329604]  intel_pstate_set_policy+0x119/0x150
[ 1840.329606]  cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329607]  cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329610]  ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329613]  acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329615]  acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329617]  acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329619]  acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329620]  process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329622]  worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329624]  kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329625]  ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329626]  ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329628]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329631]  ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

This is because if there's only one online CPU, the MSR_PM_ENABLE
(package wide)can not be enabled after resumed, due to
intel_pstate_hwp_enable() will only be invoked on AP's online
process after resumed - if there's no AP online, the HWP remains
disabled after resumed (BIOS has disabled it in S3). Then if
there comes a _PPC change notification which touches HWP register
during this stage, the warning is triggered.

Since we don't call acpi_processor_register_performance() when
HWP is enabled, the pr->performance will be NULL. When this is
NULL we don't need to do _PPC change notification.

Reported-by: Doug Smythies 
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada 
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Disassembler: Abort on an invalid/unknown AML opcode

2018-04-13T17:52:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6f0527b77d9e0129dd8e50945b0d610ed943d6b2 ]

ACPICA commit ed0389cb11a61e63c568ac1f67948fc6a7bd1aeb

An invalid opcode indicates something seriously wrong with the
input AML file. The AML parser is immediately confused and lost,
causing the resulting parse tree to be ill-formed. The actual
disassembly can then cause numerous unrelated errors and faults.

This change aborts the disassembly upon discovery of such an
opcode during the AML parse phase.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/ed0389cb
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore 
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Events: Add runtime stub support for event APIs

2018-04-13T17:52:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 861ba6351c520328e94a78c923b415faa9116287 ]

ACPICA commit 99bc3beca92c6574ea1d69de42e54f872e6373ce

It is reported that on Linux, RTC driver complains wrong errors on
hardware reduced platform:
  [    4.085420] ACPI Warning: Could not enable fixed event - real_time_clock (4) (20160422/evxface-654)

This patch fixes this by correctly adding runtime reduced hardware check.
Reported by Chandan Tagore, fixed by Lv Zheng.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/99bc3bec
Tested-by: Chandan Tagore 
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng 
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI/processor: Replace racy task affinity logic

2018-03-24T09:57:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8153f9ac43897f9f4786b30badc134fcc1a4fb11 ]

acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on
the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the
calling user space thread to the requested CPU and reset it to the original
affinity afterwards.

That's racy vs. CPU hotplug and concurrent affinity settings for that
thread resulting in code executing on the wrong CPU and overwriting the
new affinity setting.

acpi_processor_get_throttling() is invoked in two ways:

1) The CPU online callback, which is already running on the target CPU and
   obviously protected against hotplug and not affected by affinity
   settings.

2) The ACPI driver probe function, which is not protected against hotplug
   during modprobe.

Switch it over to work_on_cpu() and protect the probe function against CPU
hotplug.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Fenghua Yu 
Cc: Tony Luck 
Cc: Herbert Xu 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Sebastian Siewior 
Cc: Lai Jiangshan 
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Tejun Heo 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Len Brown 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412201042.785920903@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: sbshc: remove raw pointer from printk() message

2018-02-16T19:14:46+00:00

commit 43cdd1b716b26f6af16da4e145b6578f98798bf6 upstream.

There's no need to be printing a raw kernel pointer to the kernel log at
every boot.  So just remove it, and change the whole message to use the
correct dev_info() call at the same time.

Reported-by: Wang Qize 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: APEI / ERST: Fix missing error handling in erst_reader()

2018-01-02T19:04:56+00:00

commit bb82e0b4a7e96494f0c1004ce50cec3d7b5fb3d1 upstream.

The commit f6f828513290 ("pstore: pass allocated memory region back to
caller") changed the check of the return value from erst_read() in
erst_reader() in the following way:

        if (len == -ENOENT)
                goto skip;
-       else if (len < 0) {
-               rc = -1;
+       else if (len < sizeof(*rcd)) {
+               rc = -EIO;
                goto out;

This introduced another bug: since the comparison with sizeof() is
cast to unsigned, a negative len value doesn't hit any longer.
As a result, when an error is returned from erst_read(), the code
falls through, and it may eventually lead to some weird thing like
memory corruption.

This patch adds the negative error value check more explicitly for
addressing the issue.

Fixes: f6f828513290 (pstore: pass allocated memory region back to caller)
Tested-by: Jerry Tang 
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Acked-by: Kees Cook 
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman