linux-stable.git/block, branch v5.16.3

block: Fix fsync always failed if once failed

2022-01-27T11:02:53+00:00

commit 8a7518931baa8ea023700987f3db31cb0a80610b upstream.

We do test with inject error fault base on v4.19, after test some time we found
sync /dev/sda always failed.
[root@localhost] sync /dev/sda
sync: error syncing '/dev/sda': Input/output error

scsi log as follows:
[19069.812296] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 Send: scmd 0x00000000d03a0b6b
[19069.812302] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 CDB: Synchronize Cache(10) 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[19069.812533] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 Done: SUCCESS Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
[19069.812536] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 CDB: Synchronize Cache(10) 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[19069.812539] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 scsi host busy 1 failed 0
[19069.812542] sd 0:0:0:0: Notifying upper driver of completion (result 0)
[19069.812546] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 sd_done: completed 0 of 0 bytes
[19069.812549] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#64 0 sectors total, 0 bytes done.
[19069.812564] print_req_error: I/O error, dev sda, sector 0

ftrace log as follows:
 rep-306069 [007] .... 19654.923315: block_bio_queue: 8,0 FWS 0 + 0 [rep]
 rep-306069 [007] .... 19654.923333: block_getrq: 8,0 FWS 0 + 0 [rep]
 kworker/7:1H-250   [007] .... 19654.923352: block_rq_issue: 8,0 FF 0 () 0 + 0 [kworker/7:1H]
 -0     [007] ..s. 19654.923562: block_rq_complete: 8,0 FF () 18446744073709551615 + 0 [0]
 -0     [007] d.s. 19654.923576: block_rq_complete: 8,0 WS () 0 + 0 [-5]

As 8d6996630c03 introduce 'fq->rq_status', this data only update when 'flush_rq'
reference count isn't zero. If flush request once failed and record error code
in 'fq->rq_status'. If there is no chance to update 'fq->rq_status',then do fsync
will always failed.
To address this issue reset 'fq->rq_status' after return error code to upper layer.

Fixes: 8d6996630c03("block: fix null pointer dereference in blk_mq_rq_timed_out()")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin 
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129012659.1553733-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

block: fix async_depth sysfs interface for mq-deadline

2022-01-27T11:02:53+00:00

commit 46cdc45acb089c811d9a54fd50af33b96e5fae9d upstream.

A previous commit added this feature, but it inadvertently used the wrong
variable to show/store the setting from/to, victimized by copy/paste. Fix
it up so that the async_depth sysfs interface reads and writes from the
right setting.

Fixes: 07757588e507 ("block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of scheduler tags for synchronous requests")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215485
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

block: check minor range in device_add_disk()

2022-01-27T11:02:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit e338924bd05d6e71574bc13e310c89e10e49a8a5 ]

ioctl(fd, LOOP_CTL_ADD, 1048576) causes

  sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/dev/block/7:0'

message because such request is treated as if ioctl(fd, LOOP_CTL_ADD, 0)
due to MINORMASK == 1048575. Verify that all minor numbers for that device
fit in the minor range.

Reported-by: wangyangbo 
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b1b19379-23ee-5379-0eb5-94bf5f79f1b4@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

scsi: block: pm: Always set request queue runtime active in blk_post_runtime_resume()

2022-01-27T11:02:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6e1fcab00a23f7fe9f4fe9704905a790efa1eeab ]

John Garry reported a deadlock that occurs when trying to access a
runtime-suspended SATA device. For obscure reasons, the rescan procedure
causes the link to be hard-reset, which disconnects the device.

The rescan tries to carry out a runtime resume when accessing the device.
scsi_rescan_device() holds the SCSI device lock and won't release it until
it can put commands onto the device's block queue. This can't happen until
the queue is successfully runtime-resumed or the device is unregistered.
But the runtime resume fails because the device is disconnected, and
__scsi_remove_device() can't do the unregistration because it can't get the
device lock.

The best way to resolve this deadlock appears to be to allow the block
queue to start running again even after an unsuccessful runtime resume.
The idea is that the driver or the SCSI error handler will need to be able
to use the queue to resolve the runtime resume failure.

This patch removes the err argument to blk_post_runtime_resume() and makes
the routine act as though the resume was successful always. This fixes the
deadlock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1639999298-244569-4-git-send-email-chenxiang66@hisilicon.com
Fixes: e27829dc92e5 ("scsi: serialize ->rescan against ->remove")
Reported-and-tested-by: John Garry
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern
Signed-off-by: Xiang Chen
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

block: fix error unwinding in device_add_disk

2022-01-27T11:01:51+00:00

[ Upstream commit 99d8690aae4b2f0d1d90075de355ac087f820a66 ]

One device_add is called disk->ev will be freed by disk_release, so we
should free it twice.  Fix this by allocating disk->ev after device_add
so that the extra local unwinding can be removed entirely.

Based on an earlier patch from Tetsuo Handa.

Reported-by: syzbot 
Tested-by: syzbot 
Fixes: 83cbce9574462c6b ("block: add error handling for device_add_disk / add_disk")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211221161851.788424-1-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting

2022-01-27T11:01:35+00:00

[ Upstream commit c65e6fd460b4df796ecd6ea22e132076ed1f2820 ]

Commit 7cc4ffc55564 ("block, bfq: put reqs of waker and woken in
dispatch list") added a condition to bfq_insert_request() which added
waker's requests directly to dispatch list. The rationale was that
completing waker's IO is needed to get more IO for the current queue.
Although this rationale is valid, there is a hole in it. The waker does
not necessarily serve the IO only for the current queue and maybe it's
current IO is not needed for current queue to make progress. Furthermore
injecting IO like this completely bypasses any service accounting within
bfq and thus we do not properly track how much service is waker's queue
getting or that the waker is actually doing any IO. Depending on the
conditions this can result in the waker getting too much or too few
service.

Consider for example the following job file:

[global]
directory=/mnt/repro/
rw=write
size=8g
time_based
runtime=30
ramp_time=10
blocksize=1m
direct=0
ioengine=sync

[slowwriter]
numjobs=1
prioclass=2
prio=7
fsync=200

[fastwriter]
numjobs=1
prioclass=2
prio=0
fsync=200

Despite processes have very different IO priorities, they get the same
about of service. The reason is that bfq identifies these processes as
having waker-wakee relationship and once that happens, IO from
fastwriter gets injected during slowwriter's time slice. As a result bfq
is not aware that fastwriter has any IO to do and constantly schedules
only slowwriter's queue. Thus fastwriter is forced to compete with
slowwriter's IO all the time instead of getting its share of time based
on IO priority.

Drop the special injection condition from bfq_insert_request(). As a
result, requests will be tracked and queued in a normal way and on next
dispatch bfq_select_queue() can decide whether the waker's inserted
requests should be injected during the current queue's timeslice or not.

Fixes: 7cc4ffc55564 ("block, bfq: put reqs of waker and woken in dispatch list")
Acked-by: Paolo Valente 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125133645.27483-8-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Merge tag 'block-5.16-2021-12-19' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block

2021-12-19T20:38:53+00:00

Pull block revert from Jens Axboe:
 "It turns out that the fix for not hammering on the delayed work timer
  too much caused a performance regression for BFQ, so let's revert the
  change for now.

  I've got some ideas on how to fix it appropriately, but they should
  wait for 5.17"

* tag 'block-5.16-2021-12-19' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  Revert "block: reduce kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on() CPU consumption"

Revert "block: reduce kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on() CPU consumption"

2021-12-19T14:58:44+00:00

This reverts commit cb2ac2912a9ca7d3d26291c511939a41361d2d83.

Alex and the kernel test robot report that this causes a significant
performance regression with BFQ. I can reproduce that result, so let's
revert this one as we're close to -rc6 and we there's no point in trying
to rush a fix.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/1639853092.524jxfaem2.none@localhost/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211219141852.GH14057@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
Reported-by: Alex Xu (Hello71) 
Reported-by: kernel test robot 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

Merge tag 'block-5.16-2021-12-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block

2021-12-17T19:46:07+00:00

Pull block fixes from Jens Axboe:

 - Fix for hammering on the delayed run queue timer (me)

 - bcache regression fix for this merge window (Lin)

 - Fix a divide-by-zero in the blk-iocost code (Tejun)

* tag 'block-5.16-2021-12-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  bcache: fix NULL pointer reference in cached_dev_detach_finish
  block: reduce kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on() CPU consumption
  iocost: Fix divide-by-zero on donation from low hweight cgroup

block: reduce kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on() CPU consumption

2021-12-15T03:08:05+00:00

Dexuan reports that he's seeing spikes of very heavy CPU utilization when
running 24 disks and using the 'none' scheduler. This happens off the
sched restart path, because SCSI requires the queue to be restarted async,
and hence we're hammering on mod_delayed_work_on() to ensure that the work
item gets run appropriately.

Avoid hammering on the timer and just use queue_work_on() if no delay
has been specified.

Reported-and-tested-by: Dexuan Cui 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/BYAPR21MB1270C598ED214C0490F47400BF719@BYAPR21MB1270.namprd21.prod.outlook.com/
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe