linux-stable.git/arch/x86/kernel/fpu, branch v6.2 Linux kernel stable tree Merge tag 'x86_fpu_for_6.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2022-12-12T22:41:57+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-12-12T22:41:57+00:00 40deb5e41ac783d49371940581db2ae108a754d1 Pull x86 fpu updates from Dave Hansen: "There are two little fixes in here, one to give better XSAVE warnings and another to address some undefined behavior in offsetof(). There is also a collection of patches to fix some issues with ptrace and the protection keys register (PKRU). PKRU is a real oddity because it is exposed in the XSAVE-related ABIs, but it is generally managed without using XSAVE in the kernel. This fix thankfully came with a selftest to ward off future regressions. Summary: - Clarify XSAVE consistency warnings - Fix up ptrace interface to protection keys register (PKRU) - Avoid undefined compiler behavior with TYPE_ALIGN" * tag 'x86_fpu_for_6.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/fpu: Use _Alignof to avoid undefined behavior in TYPE_ALIGN selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace x86/fpu: Emulate XRSTOR's behavior if the xfeatures PKRU bit is not set x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace. x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_to_xstate() x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(). x86/fpu: Take task_struct* in copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() x86/fpu/xstate: Fix XSTATE_WARN_ON() to emit relevant diagnostics 
Pull x86 fpu updates from Dave Hansen:
 "There are two little fixes in here, one to give better XSAVE warnings
  and another to address some undefined behavior in offsetof().

  There is also a collection of patches to fix some issues with ptrace
  and the protection keys register (PKRU). PKRU is a real oddity because
  it is exposed in the XSAVE-related ABIs, but it is generally managed
  without using XSAVE in the kernel. This fix thankfully came with a
  selftest to ward off future regressions.

  Summary:

   - Clarify XSAVE consistency warnings

   - Fix up ptrace interface to protection keys register (PKRU)

   - Avoid undefined compiler behavior with TYPE_ALIGN"

* tag 'x86_fpu_for_6.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/fpu: Use _Alignof to avoid undefined behavior in TYPE_ALIGN
  selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace
  x86/fpu: Emulate XRSTOR's behavior if the xfeatures PKRU bit is not set
  x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace.
  x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_to_xstate()
  x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate().
  x86/fpu: Take task_struct* in copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate()
  x86/fpu/xstate: Fix XSTATE_WARN_ON() to emit relevant diagnostics
x86/fpu: Use _Alignof to avoid undefined behavior in TYPE_ALIGN 2022-11-22T16:13:03+00:00 YingChi Long me@inclyc.cn 2022-11-18T00:55:35+00:00 55228db2697c09abddcb9487c3d9fa5854a932cd WG14 N2350 specifies that it is an undefined behavior to have type definitions within offsetof", see https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm This specification is also part of C23. Therefore, replace the TYPE_ALIGN macro with the _Alignof builtin to avoid undefined behavior. (_Alignof itself is C11 and the kernel is built with -gnu11). ISO C11 _Alignof is subtly different from the GNU C extension __alignof__. Latter is the preferred alignment and _Alignof the minimal alignment. For long long on x86 these are 8 and 4 respectively. The macro TYPE_ALIGN's behavior matches _Alignof rather than __alignof__. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@inclyc.cn> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220925153151.2467884-1-me@inclyc.cn 
WG14 N2350 specifies that it is an undefined behavior to have type
definitions within offsetof", see

  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm

This specification is also part of C23.

Therefore, replace the TYPE_ALIGN macro with the _Alignof builtin to
avoid undefined behavior. (_Alignof itself is C11 and the kernel is
built with -gnu11).

ISO C11 _Alignof is subtly different from the GNU C extension
__alignof__. Latter is the preferred alignment and _Alignof the
minimal alignment. For long long on x86 these are 8 and 4
respectively.

The macro TYPE_ALIGN's behavior matches _Alignof rather than
__alignof__.

  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@inclyc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220925153151.2467884-1-me@inclyc.cn
x86/fpu: Emulate XRSTOR's behavior if the xfeatures PKRU bit is not set 2022-11-16T23:06:34+00:00 Kyle Huey me@kylehuey.com 2022-11-15T23:09:31+00:00 d7e5aceace514a2b1b3ca3dc44f93f1704766ca7 The hardware XRSTOR instruction resets the PKRU register to its hardware init value (namely 0) if the PKRU bit is not set in the xfeatures mask. Emulating that here restores the pre-5.14 behavior for PTRACE_SET_REGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE, and makes sigreturn (which still uses XRSTOR) and ptrace behave identically. KVM has never used XRSTOR and never had this behavior, so KVM opts-out of this emulation by passing a NULL pkru pointer to copy_uabi_to_xstate(). Fixes: e84ba47e313d ("x86/fpu: Hook up PKRU into ptrace()") Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-6-khuey%40kylehuey.com 
The hardware XRSTOR instruction resets the PKRU register to its hardware
init value (namely 0) if the PKRU bit is not set in the xfeatures mask.
Emulating that here restores the pre-5.14 behavior for PTRACE_SET_REGSET
with NT_X86_XSTATE, and makes sigreturn (which still uses XRSTOR) and
ptrace behave identically. KVM has never used XRSTOR and never had this
behavior, so KVM opts-out of this emulation by passing a NULL pkru pointer
to copy_uabi_to_xstate().

Fixes: e84ba47e313d ("x86/fpu: Hook up PKRU into ptrace()")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-6-khuey%40kylehuey.com
x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace. 2022-11-16T23:03:53+00:00 Kyle Huey me@kylehuey.com 2022-11-15T23:09:30+00:00 4a804c4f8356393d6b5eff7600f07615d7869c13 Move KVM's PKRU handling code in fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate() to copy_uabi_to_xstate() so that it is shared with other APIs that write the XSTATE such as PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE. This restores the pre-5.14 behavior of ptrace. The regression can be seen by running gdb and executing `p $pkru`, `set $pkru = 42`, and `p $pkru`. On affected kernels (5.14+) the write to the PKRU register (which gdb performs through ptrace) is ignored. [ dhansen: removed stable@ tag for now. The ABI was broken for long enough that this is not urgent material. Let's let it stew in tip for a few weeks before it's submitted to stable because there are so many ABIs potentially affected. ] Fixes: e84ba47e313d ("x86/fpu: Hook up PKRU into ptrace()") Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-5-khuey%40kylehuey.com 
Move KVM's PKRU handling code in fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate() to
copy_uabi_to_xstate() so that it is shared with other APIs that write the
XSTATE such as PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE.

This restores the pre-5.14 behavior of ptrace. The regression can be seen
by running gdb and executing `p $pkru`, `set $pkru = 42`, and `p $pkru`.
On affected kernels (5.14+) the write to the PKRU register (which gdb
performs through ptrace) is ignored.

[ dhansen: removed stable@ tag for now.  The ABI was broken for long
	   enough that this is not urgent material.  Let's let it stew
	   in tip for a few weeks before it's submitted to stable
	   because there are so many ABIs potentially affected. ]

Fixes: e84ba47e313d ("x86/fpu: Hook up PKRU into ptrace()")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-5-khuey%40kylehuey.com
x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_to_xstate() 2022-11-16T23:03:30+00:00 Kyle Huey me@kylehuey.com 2022-11-15T23:09:29+00:00 2c87767c35ee9744f666ccec869d5fe742c3de0a In preparation for moving PKRU handling code out of fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate() and into copy_uabi_to_xstate(), add an argument that copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate() can use to pass the canonical location of the PKRU value. For copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() the kernel will actually restore the PKRU value from the fpstate, but pass in the thread_struct's pkru location anyways for consistency. Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-4-khuey%40kylehuey.com 
In preparation for moving PKRU handling code out of
fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate() and into copy_uabi_to_xstate(), add an
argument that copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate() can use to pass the
canonical location of the PKRU value. For
copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() the kernel will actually restore the
PKRU value from the fpstate, but pass in the thread_struct's pkru location
anyways for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-4-khuey%40kylehuey.com
x86/fpu: Add a pkru argument to copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(). 2022-11-16T23:03:01+00:00 Kyle Huey me@kylehuey.com 2022-11-15T23:09:28+00:00 1c813ce0305571e1b2e4cc4acca451da9e6ad18f Both KVM (through KVM_SET_XSTATE) and ptrace (through PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE) ultimately call copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(), but the canonical locations for the current PKRU value for KVM guests and processes in a ptrace stop are different (in the kvm_vcpu_arch and the thread_state structs respectively). In preparation for eventually handling PKRU in copy_uabi_to_xstate, pass in a pointer to the PKRU location. Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-3-khuey%40kylehuey.com 
Both KVM (through KVM_SET_XSTATE) and ptrace (through PTRACE_SETREGSET
with NT_X86_XSTATE) ultimately call copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(),
but the canonical locations for the current PKRU value for KVM guests
and processes in a ptrace stop are different (in the kvm_vcpu_arch and
the thread_state structs respectively).

In preparation for eventually handling PKRU in
copy_uabi_to_xstate, pass in a pointer to the PKRU location.

Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-3-khuey%40kylehuey.com
x86/fpu: Take task_struct* in copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() 2022-11-16T23:02:30+00:00 Kyle Huey me@kylehuey.com 2022-11-15T23:09:27+00:00 6a877d2450ace4f27c012519e5a1ae818f931983 This will allow copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() to grab the address of thread_struct's pkru value in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-2-khuey%40kylehuey.com 
This will allow copy_sigframe_from_user_to_xstate() to grab the address of
thread_struct's pkru value in a later patch.

Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221115230932.7126-2-khuey%40kylehuey.com
x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions 2022-11-10T15:57:38+00:00 Mel Gorman mgorman@techsingularity.net 2022-11-10T12:44:00+00:00 36b038791e1e2baea892e9276588815fd14894b4 Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 Preemption disabled at: fpu_clone CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G E (unreleased) Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl ? fpu_clone __might_resched rt_spin_lock fpu_clone ? copy_thread ? copy_process ? shmem_alloc_inode ? kmem_cache_alloc ? kernel_clone ? __do_sys_clone ? do_syscall_64 ? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode ? do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe </TASK> Mike says: The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(), and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic() returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never been enabled. Mike's assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables preemption so calling spin_lock_irq() in fpu_inherit_perms() is unsafe. This problem exists since commit 9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features"). Even though the original bug report should not have enabled the paths at all, the bug still exists. fpregs_lock is necessary when editing the FPU registers or a task's FP state but it is not necessary for fpu_inherit_perms(). The only write of any FP state in fpu_inherit_perms() is for the new child which is not running yet and cannot context switch or be borrowed by a kernel thread yet. Hence, fpregs_lock is not protecting anything in the new child until clone() completes and can be dropped earlier. The siglock still needs to be acquired by fpu_inherit_perms() as the read of the parent's permissions has to be serialised. [ bp: Cleanup splat. ] Fixes: 9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features") Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110124400.zgymc2lnwqjukgfh@techsingularity.net 
Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt
but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree.

   BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
   in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd
   preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
   RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
   Preemption disabled at:
   fpu_clone
   CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G            E       (unreleased)
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    dump_stack_lvl
    ? fpu_clone
    __might_resched
    rt_spin_lock
    fpu_clone
    ? copy_thread
    ? copy_process
    ? shmem_alloc_inode
    ? kmem_cache_alloc
    ? kernel_clone
    ? __do_sys_clone
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? exc_page_fault
    ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
    </TASK>

Mike says:

  The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(),
  and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic()
  returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never
  been enabled.

Mike's assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables
preemption so calling spin_lock_irq() in fpu_inherit_perms() is unsafe. This
problem exists since commit

  9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features").

Even though the original bug report should not have enabled the paths at
all, the bug still exists.

fpregs_lock is necessary when editing the FPU registers or a task's FP
state but it is not necessary for fpu_inherit_perms(). The only write
of any FP state in fpu_inherit_perms() is for the new child which is
not running yet and cannot context switch or be borrowed by a kernel
thread yet. Hence, fpregs_lock is not protecting anything in the new
child until clone() completes and can be dropped earlier. The siglock
still needs to be acquired by fpu_inherit_perms() as the read of the
parent's permissions has to be serialised.

  [ bp: Cleanup splat. ]

Fixes: 9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features")
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110124400.zgymc2lnwqjukgfh@techsingularity.net
x86/fpu/xstate: Fix XSTATE_WARN_ON() to emit relevant diagnostics 2022-11-09T12:28:31+00:00 Andrew Cooper andrew.cooper3@citrix.com 2022-08-10T22:19:09+00:00 48280042f2c6e3ac2cfb1d8b752ab4a7e0baea24 "XSAVE consistency problem" has been reported under Xen, but that's the extent of my divination skills. Modify XSTATE_WARN_ON() to force the caller to provide relevant diagnostic information, and modify each caller suitably. For check_xstate_against_struct(), this removes a double WARN() where one will do perfectly fine. CC stable as this has been wonky debugging for 7 years and it is good to have there too. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810221909.12768-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com 
"XSAVE consistency problem" has been reported under Xen, but that's the extent
of my divination skills.

Modify XSTATE_WARN_ON() to force the caller to provide relevant diagnostic
information, and modify each caller suitably.

For check_xstate_against_struct(), this removes a double WARN() where one will
do perfectly fine.

CC stable as this has been wonky debugging for 7 years and it is good to
have there too.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810221909.12768-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
x86/fpu: Fix copy_xstate_to_uabi() to copy init states correctly 2022-10-21T22:22:09+00:00 Chang S. Bae chang.seok.bae@intel.com 2022-10-21T18:58:44+00:00 471f0aa7fa64e23766a1473b32d9ec3f0718895a When an extended state component is not present in fpstate, but in init state, the function copies from init_fpstate via copy_feature(). But, dynamic states are not present in init_fpstate because of all-zeros init states. Then retrieving them from init_fpstate will explode like this: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10 ? __copy_xstate_to_uabi_buf+0x381/0x870 fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi+0x28/0x80 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x14c/0x1460 [kvm] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 ? vmx_vcpu_put+0x2e/0x260 [kvm_intel] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xea/0x6b0 [kvm] ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xea/0x6b0 [kvm] ? __fget_light+0xd4/0x130 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe3/0x910 ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x27/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Adjust the 'mask' to zero out the userspace buffer for the features that are not available both from fpstate and from init_fpstate. The dynamic features depend on the compacted XSAVE format. Ensure it is enabled before reading XCOMP_BV in init_fpstate. Fixes: 2308ee57d93d ("x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode") Reported-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/BYAPR11MB3717EDEF2351C958F2C86EED95259@BYAPR11MB3717.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021185844.13472-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com 
When an extended state component is not present in fpstate, but in init
state, the function copies from init_fpstate via copy_feature().

But, dynamic states are not present in init_fpstate because of all-zeros
init states. Then retrieving them from init_fpstate will explode like this:

 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
 ...
 RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
  ? __copy_xstate_to_uabi_buf+0x381/0x870
  fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi+0x28/0x80
  kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x14c/0x1460 [kvm]
  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
  ? vmx_vcpu_put+0x2e/0x260 [kvm_intel]
  kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xea/0x6b0 [kvm]
  ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xea/0x6b0 [kvm]
  ? __fget_light+0xd4/0x130
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe3/0x910
  ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
  ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x27/0x50
  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Adjust the 'mask' to zero out the userspace buffer for the features that
are not available both from fpstate and from init_fpstate.

The dynamic features depend on the compacted XSAVE format. Ensure it is
enabled before reading XCOMP_BV in init_fpstate.

Fixes: 2308ee57d93d ("x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode")
Reported-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/BYAPR11MB3717EDEF2351C958F2C86EED95259@BYAPR11MB3717.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021185844.13472-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com