[ Upstream commit 5898b43af954b83c4a4ee4ab85c4dbafa395822a ]
The set_memory_uc() approach doesn't work well in all cases.
As Dan pointed out when "The VMM unmapped the bad page from
guest physical space and passed the machine check to the guest."
"The guest gets virtual #MC on an access to that page. When
the guest tries to do set_memory_uc() and instructs cpa_flush()
to do clean caches that results in taking another fault / exception
perhaps because the VMM unmapped the page from the guest."
Since the driver has special knowledge to handle NP or UC,
mark the poisoned page with NP and let driver handle it when
it comes down to repair.
Please refer to discussions here for more details.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPcyv4hrXPb1tASBZUg-GgdVs0OOFKXMXLiHmktg_kFi7YBMyQ@mail.gmail.com/
Now since poisoned page is marked as not-present, in order to
avoid writing to a not-present page and trigger kernel Oops,
also fix pmem_do_write().
Fixes: 284ce4011ba6 ("x86/memory_failure: Introduce {set, clear}_mce_nospec()")
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165272615484.103830.2563950688772226611.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 12441ccdf5e2f5a01a46e344976cbbd3d46845c9 ]
__setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in
init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. A return
of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown kernel
parameter and added to init's (limited) argument (no '=') or environment
(with '=') strings. So return 1 from these x86 __setup handlers.
Examples:
Unknown kernel command line parameters "apicpmtimer
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage-517rc8 vdso=1 ring3mwait=disable", will be
passed to user space.
Run /sbin/init as init process
with arguments:
/sbin/init
apicpmtimer
with environment:
HOME=/
TERM=linux
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage-517rc8
vdso=1
ring3mwait=disable
Fixes: 2aae950b21e4 ("x86_64: Add vDSO for x86-64 with gettimeofday/clock_gettime/getcpu")
Fixes: 77b52b4c5c66 ("x86: add "debugpat" boot option")
Fixes: e16fd002afe2 ("x86/cpufeature: Enable RING3MWAIT for Knights Landing")
Fixes: b8ce33590687 ("x86_64: convert to clock events")
Reported-by: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/64644a2f-4a20-bab3-1e15-3b2cdd0defe3@omprussia.ru
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220314012725.26661-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 0c9782e204d3cc5625b9e8bf4e8625d38dfe0139 upstream.
When the system runs out of enclave memory, SGX can reclaim EPC pages
by swapping to normal RAM. These backing pages are allocated via a
per-enclave shared memory area. Since SGX allows unlimited over
commit on EPC memory, the reclaimer thread can allocate a large
number of backing RAM pages in response to EPC memory pressure.
When the shared memory backing RAM allocation occurs during
the reclaimer thread context, the shared memory is charged to
the root memory control group, and the shmem usage of the enclave
is not properly accounted for, making cgroups ineffective at
limiting the amount of RAM an enclave can consume.
For example, when using a cgroup to launch a set of test
enclaves, the kernel does not properly account for 50% - 75% of
shmem page allocations on average. In the worst case, when
nearly all allocations occur during the reclaimer thread, the
kernel accounts less than a percent of the amount of shmem used
by the enclave's cgroup to the correct cgroup.
SGX stores a list of mm_structs that are associated with
an enclave. Pick one of them during reclaim and charge that
mm's memcg with the shmem allocation. The one that gets picked
is arbitrary, but this list almost always only has one mm. The
cases where there is more than one mm with different memcg's
are not worth considering.
Create a new function - sgx_encl_alloc_backing(). This function
is used whenever a new backing storage page needs to be
allocated. Previously the same function was used for page
allocation as well as retrieving a previously allocated page.
Prior to backing page allocation, if there is a mm_struct associated
with the enclave that is requesting the allocation, it is set
as the active memory control group.
[ dhansen: - fix merge conflict with ELDU fixes
- check against actual ksgxd_tsk, not ->mm ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220520174248.4918-1-kristen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e5f28623ceb103e13fc3d7bd45edf9818b227fd0 upstream.
In mce_threshold_create_device(), if threshold_create_bank() fails, the
previously allocated threshold banks array @bp will be leaked because
the call to mce_threshold_remove_device() will not free it.
This happens because mce_threshold_remove_device() fetches the pointer
through the threshold_banks per-CPU variable but bp is written there
only after the bank creation is successful, and not before, when
threshold_create_bank() fails.
Add a helper which unwinds all the bank creation work previously done
and pass into it the previously allocated threshold banks array for
freeing.
[ bp: Massage. ]
Fixes: 6458de97fc15 ("x86/mce/amd: Straighten CPU hotplug path")
Co-developed-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>
Co-developed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220329104705.65256-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e3a3bbe3e99de73043a1d32d36cf4d211dc58c7e upstream. A PCMD (Paging Crypto MetaData) page contains the PCMD structures of enclave pages that have been encrypted and moved to the shmem backing store. When all enclave pages sharing a PCMD page are loaded in the enclave, there is no need for the PCMD page and it can be truncated from the backing store. A few issues appeared around the truncation of PCMD pages. The known issues have been addressed but the PCMD handling code could be made more robust by loudly complaining if any new issue appears in this area. Add a check that will complain with a warning if the PCMD page is not actually empty after it has been truncated. There should never be data in the PCMD page at this point since it is was just checked to be empty and truncated with enclave mutex held and is updated with the enclave mutex held. Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6495120fed43fafc1496d09dd23df922b9a32709.1652389823.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit af117837ceb9a78e995804ade4726ad2c2c8981f upstream.
Haitao reported encountering a WARN triggered by the ENCLS[ELDU]
instruction faulting with a #GP.
The WARN is encountered when the reclaimer evicts a range of
pages from the enclave when the same pages are faulted back right away.
Consider two enclave pages (ENCLAVE_A and ENCLAVE_B)
sharing a PCMD page (PCMD_AB). ENCLAVE_A is in the
enclave memory and ENCLAVE_B is in the backing store. PCMD_AB contains
just one entry, that of ENCLAVE_B.
Scenario proceeds where ENCLAVE_A is being evicted from the enclave
while ENCLAVE_B is faulted in.
sgx_reclaim_pages() {
...
/*
* Reclaim ENCLAVE_A
*/
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
/*
* Get a reference to ENCLAVE_A's
* shmem page where enclave page
* encrypted data will be stored
* as well as a reference to the
* enclave page's PCMD data page,
* PCMD_AB.
* Release mutex before writing
* any data to the shmem pages.
*/
sgx_encl_get_backing(...);
encl_page->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BEING_RECLAIMED;
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
/*
* Fault ENCLAVE_B
*/
sgx_vma_fault() {
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
/*
* Get reference to
* ENCLAVE_B's shmem page
* as well as PCMD_AB.
*/
sgx_encl_get_backing(...)
/*
* Load page back into
* enclave via ELDU.
*/
/*
* Release reference to
* ENCLAVE_B' shmem page and
* PCMD_AB.
*/
sgx_encl_put_backing(...);
/*
* PCMD_AB is found empty so
* it and ENCLAVE_B's shmem page
* are truncated.
*/
/* Truncate ENCLAVE_B backing page */
sgx_encl_truncate_backing_page();
/* Truncate PCMD_AB */
sgx_encl_truncate_backing_page();
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
...
}
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
encl_page->desc &=
~SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BEING_RECLAIMED;
/*
* Write encrypted contents of
* ENCLAVE_A to ENCLAVE_A shmem
* page and its PCMD data to
* PCMD_AB.
*/
sgx_encl_put_backing(...)
/*
* Reference to PCMD_AB is
* dropped and it is truncated.
* ENCLAVE_A's PCMD data is lost.
*/
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
}
What happens next depends on whether it is ENCLAVE_A being faulted
in or ENCLAVE_B being evicted - but both end up with ENCLS[ELDU] faulting
with a #GP.
If ENCLAVE_A is faulted then at the time sgx_encl_get_backing() is called
a new PCMD page is allocated and providing the empty PCMD data for
ENCLAVE_A would cause ENCLS[ELDU] to #GP
If ENCLAVE_B is evicted first then a new PCMD_AB would be allocated by the
reclaimer but later when ENCLAVE_A is faulted the ENCLS[ELDU] instruction
would #GP during its checks of the PCMD value and the WARN would be
encountered.
Noting that the reclaimer sets SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BEING_RECLAIMED at the time
it obtains a reference to the backing store pages of an enclave page it
is in the process of reclaiming, fix the race by only truncating the PCMD
page after ensuring that no page sharing the PCMD page is in the process
of being reclaimed.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 08999b2489b4 ("x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page")
Reported-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ed20a5db516aa813873268e125680041ae11dfcf.1652389823.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0e4e729a830c1e7f31d3b3fbf8feb355a402b117 upstream.
Haitao reported encountering a WARN triggered by the ENCLS[ELDU]
instruction faulting with a #GP.
The WARN is encountered when the reclaimer evicts a range of
pages from the enclave when the same pages are faulted back
right away.
The SGX backing storage is accessed on two paths: when there
are insufficient free pages in the EPC the reclaimer works
to move enclave pages to the backing storage and as enclaves
access pages that have been moved to the backing storage
they are retrieved from there as part of page fault handling.
An oversubscribed SGX system will often run the reclaimer and
page fault handler concurrently and needs to ensure that the
backing store is accessed safely between the reclaimer and
the page fault handler. This is not the case because the
reclaimer accesses the backing store without the enclave mutex
while the page fault handler accesses the backing store with
the enclave mutex.
Consider the scenario where a page is faulted while a page sharing
a PCMD page with the faulted page is being reclaimed. The
consequence is a race between the reclaimer and page fault
handler, the reclaimer attempting to access a PCMD at the
same time it is truncated by the page fault handler. This
could result in lost PCMD data. Data may still be
lost if the reclaimer wins the race, this is addressed in
the following patch.
The reclaimer accesses pages from the backing storage without
holding the enclave mutex and runs the risk of concurrently
accessing the backing storage with the page fault handler that
does access the backing storage with the enclave mutex held.
In the scenario below a PCMD page is truncated from the backing
store after all its pages have been loaded in to the enclave
at the same time the PCMD page is loaded from the backing store
when one of its pages are reclaimed:
sgx_reclaim_pages() { sgx_vma_fault() {
...
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
...
__sgx_encl_eldu() {
...
if (pcmd_page_empty) {
/*
* EPC page being reclaimed /*
* shares a PCMD page with an * PCMD page truncated
* enclave page that is being * while requested from
* faulted in. * reclaimer.
*/ */
sgx_encl_get_backing() <----------> sgx_encl_truncate_backing_page()
}
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
} }
In this scenario there is a race between the reclaimer and the page fault
handler when the reclaimer attempts to get access to the same PCMD page
that is being truncated. This could result in the reclaimer writing to
the PCMD page that is then truncated, causing the PCMD data to be lost,
or in a new PCMD page being allocated. The lost PCMD data may still occur
after protecting the backing store access with the mutex - this is fixed
in the next patch. By ensuring the backing store is accessed with the mutex
held the enclave page state can be made accurate with the
SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BEING_RECLAIMED flag accurately reflecting that a page
is in the process of being reclaimed.
Consistently protect the reclaimer's backing store access with the
enclave's mutex to ensure that it can safely run concurrently with the
page fault handler.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer")
Reported-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fa2e04c561a8555bfe1f4e7adc37d60efc77387b.1652389823.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2154e1c11b7080aa19f47160bd26b6f39bbd7824 upstream.
Recent commit 08999b2489b4 ("x86/sgx: Free backing memory
after faulting the enclave page") expanded __sgx_encl_eldu()
to clear an enclave page's PCMD (Paging Crypto MetaData)
from the PCMD page in the backing store after the enclave
page is restored to the enclave.
Since the PCMD page in the backing store is modified the page
should be marked as dirty to ensure the modified data is retained.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 08999b2489b4 ("x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00cd2ac480db01058d112e347b32599c1a806bc4.1652389823.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6bd429643cc265e94a9d19839c771bcc5d008fa8 upstream.
SGX uses shmem backing storage to store encrypted enclave pages
and their crypto metadata when enclave pages are moved out of
enclave memory. Two shmem backing storage pages are associated with
each enclave page - one backing page to contain the encrypted
enclave page data and one backing page (shared by a few
enclave pages) to contain the crypto metadata used by the
processor to verify the enclave page when it is loaded back into
the enclave.
sgx_encl_put_backing() is used to release references to the
backing storage and, optionally, mark both backing store pages
as dirty.
Managing references and dirty status together in this way results
in both backing store pages marked as dirty, even if only one of
the backing store pages are changed.
Additionally, waiting until the page reference is dropped to set
the page dirty risks a race with the page fault handler that
may load outdated data into the enclave when a page is faulted
right after it is reclaimed.
Consider what happens if the reclaimer writes a page to the backing
store and the page is immediately faulted back, before the reclaimer
is able to set the dirty bit of the page:
sgx_reclaim_pages() { sgx_vma_fault() {
...
sgx_encl_get_backing();
... ...
sgx_reclaimer_write() {
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
/* Write data to backing store */
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
}
mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
__sgx_encl_eldu() {
...
/*
* Enclave backing store
* page not released
* nor marked dirty -
* contents may not be
* up to date.
*/
sgx_encl_get_backing();
...
/*
* Enclave data restored
* from backing store
* and PCMD pages that
* are not up to date.
* ENCLS[ELDU] faults
* because of MAC or PCMD
* checking failure.
*/
sgx_encl_put_backing();
}
...
/* set page dirty */
sgx_encl_put_backing();
...
mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
} }
Remove the option to sgx_encl_put_backing() to set the backing
pages as dirty and set the needed pages as dirty right after
receiving important data while enclave mutex is held. This ensures that
the page fault handler can get up to date data from a page and prepares
the code for a following change where only one of the backing pages
need to be marked as dirty.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer")
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/8922e48f-6646-c7cc-6393-7c78dcf23d23@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fa9f98986923f43e72ef4c6702a50b2a0b3c42e3.1652389823.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f9e14dbbd454581061c736bf70bf5cbb15ac927c upstream.
When resuming from system sleep state, restore_processor_state()
restores the boot CPU MSRs. These MSRs could be emulated by microcode.
If microcode is not loaded yet, writing to emulated MSRs leads to
unchecked MSR access error:
...
PM: Calling lapic_suspend+0x0/0x210
unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x10f (tried to write 0x0...0) at rIP: ... (native_write_msr)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? restore_processor_state
x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel
acpi_suspend_enter
suspend_devices_and_enter
pm_suspend.cold
state_store
kobj_attr_store
sysfs_kf_write
kernfs_fop_write_iter
new_sync_write
vfs_write
ksys_write
__x64_sys_write
do_syscall_64
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
RIP: 0033:0x7fda13c260a7
To ensure microcode emulated MSRs are available for restoration, load
the microcode on the boot CPU before restoring these MSRs.
[ Pawan: write commit message and productize it. ]
Fixes: e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume")
Reported-by: Kyle D. Pelton <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kyle D. Pelton <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215841
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4350dfbf785cd482d3fafa72b2b49c83102df3ce.1650386317.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>