linux-stable.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c, branch linux-6.5.y Linux kernel stable tree x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode 2023-11-20T10:56:43+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:52+00:00 e310a2eb785f015d6bf9656f42136f1a2c8492f3 [ Upstream commit dc6306ad5b0dda040baf1fde3cfd458e6abfc4da ] The SRSO default safe-ret mitigation is reported as "mitigated" even if microcode hasn't been updated. That's wrong because userspace may still be vulnerable to SRSO attacks due to IBPB not flushing branch type predictions. Report the safe-ret + !microcode case as vulnerable. Also report the microcode-only case as vulnerable as it leaves the kernel open to attacks. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a8a14f97d1b0e03ec255c81637afdf4cf0ae9c99.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit dc6306ad5b0dda040baf1fde3cfd458e6abfc4da ]

The SRSO default safe-ret mitigation is reported as "mitigated" even if
microcode hasn't been updated.  That's wrong because userspace may still
be vulnerable to SRSO attacks due to IBPB not flushing branch type
predictions.

Report the safe-ret + !microcode case as vulnerable.

Also report the microcode-only case as vulnerable as it leaves the
kernel open to attacks.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a8a14f97d1b0e03ec255c81637afdf4cf0ae9c99.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Print mitigation for retbleed IBPB case 2023-11-20T10:56:43+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:51+00:00 1f7f6ef03896e0f6ef3bde180245923f24610819 [ Upstream commit de9f5f7b06a5b7adbfdd8016f011120a4e928add ] When overriding the requested mitigation with IBPB due to retbleed=ibpb, print the mitigation in the usual format instead of a custom error message. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec3af919e267773d896c240faf30bfc6a1fd6304.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: dc6306ad5b0d ("x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit de9f5f7b06a5b7adbfdd8016f011120a4e928add ]

When overriding the requested mitigation with IBPB due to retbleed=ibpb,
print the mitigation in the usual format instead of a custom error
message.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec3af919e267773d896c240faf30bfc6a1fd6304.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: dc6306ad5b0d ("x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for (possible) future fixed HW 2023-11-20T10:56:43+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:49+00:00 68f9ff154168e598274c7ae0a7b73cc56791c765 [ Upstream commit 1d1142ac51307145dbb256ac3535a1d43a1c9800 ] Make the SBPB check more robust against the (possible) case where future HW has SRSO fixed but doesn't have the SRSO_NO bit set. Fixes: 1b5277c0ea0b ("x86/srso: Add SRSO_NO support") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cee5050db750b391c9f35f5334f8ff40e66c01b9.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 1d1142ac51307145dbb256ac3535a1d43a1c9800 ]

Make the SBPB check more robust against the (possible) case where future
HW has SRSO fixed but doesn't have the SRSO_NO bit set.

Fixes: 1b5277c0ea0b ("x86/srso: Add SRSO_NO support")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cee5050db750b391c9f35f5334f8ff40e66c01b9.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Fix SBPB enablement for spec_rstack_overflow=off 2023-10-06T11:15:55+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:48+00:00 e3cb8b2c391b1f287eb76df4ba37880f4ea56d8a [ Upstream commit 01b057b2f4cc2d905a0bd92195657dbd9a7005ab ] If the user has requested no SRSO mitigation, other mitigations can use the lighter-weight SBPB instead of IBPB. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b20820c3cfd1003171135ec8d762a0b957348497.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 01b057b2f4cc2d905a0bd92195657dbd9a7005ab ]

If the user has requested no SRSO mitigation, other mitigations can use
the lighter-weight SBPB instead of IBPB.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b20820c3cfd1003171135ec8d762a0b957348497.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Set CPUID feature bits independently of bug or mitigation status 2023-10-06T11:15:55+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:46+00:00 afae367e91c800669d273af6c6269b2800be52ba [ Upstream commit 91857ae20303cc98ed36720d9868fcd604a2ee75 ] Booting with mitigations=off incorrectly prevents the X86_FEATURE_{IBPB_BRTYPE,SBPB} CPUID bits from getting set. Also, future CPUs without X86_BUG_SRSO might still have IBPB with branch type prediction flushing, in which case SBPB should be used instead of IBPB. The current code doesn't allow for that. Also, cpu_has_ibpb_brtype_microcode() has some surprising side effects and the setting of these feature bits really doesn't belong in the mitigation code anyway. Move it to earlier. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/869a1709abfe13b673bdd10c2f4332ca253a40bc.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 91857ae20303cc98ed36720d9868fcd604a2ee75 ]

Booting with mitigations=off incorrectly prevents the
X86_FEATURE_{IBPB_BRTYPE,SBPB} CPUID bits from getting set.

Also, future CPUs without X86_BUG_SRSO might still have IBPB with branch
type prediction flushing, in which case SBPB should be used instead of
IBPB.  The current code doesn't allow for that.

Also, cpu_has_ibpb_brtype_microcode() has some surprising side effects
and the setting of these feature bits really doesn't belong in the
mitigation code anyway.  Move it to earlier.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/869a1709abfe13b673bdd10c2f4332ca253a40bc.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Fix srso_show_state() side effect 2023-10-06T11:15:55+00:00 Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@kernel.org 2023-09-05T05:04:45+00:00 67418b4b4f13c7562a7e5121c9580afbf09ad732 [ Upstream commit a8cf700c17d9ca6cb8ee7dc5c9330dbac3948237 ] Reading the 'spec_rstack_overflow' sysfs file can trigger an unnecessary MSR write, and possibly even a (handled) exception if the microcode hasn't been updated. Avoid all that by just checking X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE instead, which gets set by srso_select_mitigation() if the updated microcode exists. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/27d128899cb8aee9eb2b57ddc996742b0c1d776b.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a8cf700c17d9ca6cb8ee7dc5c9330dbac3948237 ]

Reading the 'spec_rstack_overflow' sysfs file can trigger an unnecessary
MSR write, and possibly even a (handled) exception if the microcode
hasn't been updated.

Avoid all that by just checking X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE instead, which
gets set by srso_select_mitigation() if the updated microcode exists.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/27d128899cb8aee9eb2b57ddc996742b0c1d776b.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
x86/srso: Correct the mitigation status when SMT is disabled 2023-08-18T10:43:10+00:00 Borislav Petkov (AMD) bp@alien8.de 2023-08-15T09:53:13+00:00 6405b72e8d17bd1875a56ae52d23ec3cd51b9d66 Specify how is SRSO mitigated when SMT is disabled. Also, correct the SMT check for that. Fixes: e9fbc47b818b ("x86/srso: Disable the mitigation on unaffected configurations") Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814200813.p5czl47zssuej7nv@treble 
Specify how is SRSO mitigated when SMT is disabled. Also, correct the
SMT check for that.

Fixes: e9fbc47b818b ("x86/srso: Disable the mitigation on unaffected configurations")
Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814200813.p5czl47zssuej7nv@treble
x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM 2023-08-16T19:58:59+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2023-08-14T11:44:35+00:00 864bcaa38ee44ec6c0e43f79c2d2997b977e26b2 Similar to how it doesn't make sense to have UNTRAIN_RET have two untrain calls, it also doesn't make sense for VMEXIT to have an extra IBPB call. This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB. Also, the (SEV) VMEXIT case seems to have been overlooked. Redefine the meaning of the synthetic IBPB flags to: - ENTRY_IBPB -- issue IBPB on entry (was: entry + VMEXIT) - IBPB_ON_VMEXIT -- issue IBPB on VMEXIT And have 'retbleed=ibpb' set *BOTH* feature flags to ensure it retains the previous behaviour and issues IBPB on entry+VMEXIT. The new 'srso=ibpb_vmexit' option only sets IBPB_ON_VMEXIT. Create UNTRAIN_RET_VM specifically for the VMEXIT case, and have that check IBPB_ON_VMEXIT. All this avoids having the VMEXIT case having to check both ENTRY_IBPB and IBPB_ON_VMEXIT and simplifies the alternatives. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121149.109557833@infradead.org 
Similar to how it doesn't make sense to have UNTRAIN_RET have two
untrain calls, it also doesn't make sense for VMEXIT to have an extra
IBPB call.

This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB.
Also, the (SEV) VMEXIT case seems to have been overlooked.

Redefine the meaning of the synthetic IBPB flags to:

 - ENTRY_IBPB     -- issue IBPB on entry  (was: entry + VMEXIT)
 - IBPB_ON_VMEXIT -- issue IBPB on VMEXIT

And have 'retbleed=ibpb' set *BOTH* feature flags to ensure it retains
the previous behaviour and issues IBPB on entry+VMEXIT.

The new 'srso=ibpb_vmexit' option only sets IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.

Create UNTRAIN_RET_VM specifically for the VMEXIT case, and have that
check IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.

All this avoids having the VMEXIT case having to check both ENTRY_IBPB
and IBPB_ON_VMEXIT and simplifies the alternatives.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121149.109557833@infradead.org
x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess 2023-08-16T19:58:59+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2023-08-14T11:44:34+00:00 e7c25c441e9e0fa75b4c83e0b26306b702cfe90d Since there can only be one active return_thunk, there only needs be one (matching) untrain_ret. It fundamentally doesn't make sense to allow multiple untrain_ret at the same time. Fold all the 3 different untrain methods into a single (temporary) helper stub. Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121149.042774962@infradead.org 
Since there can only be one active return_thunk, there only needs be
one (matching) untrain_ret. It fundamentally doesn't make sense to
allow multiple untrain_ret at the same time.

Fold all the 3 different untrain methods into a single (temporary)
helper stub.

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121149.042774962@infradead.org
x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed methods 2023-08-16T19:47:53+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2023-08-14T11:44:32+00:00 d025b7bac07a6e90b6b98b487f88854ad9247c39 Rename the original retbleed return thunk and untrain_ret to retbleed_return_thunk() and retbleed_untrain_ret(). No functional changes. Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121148.909378169@infradead.org 
Rename the original retbleed return thunk and untrain_ret to
retbleed_return_thunk() and retbleed_untrain_ret().

No functional changes.

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121148.909378169@infradead.org