linux-stable.git/arch/powerpc, branch linux-5.11.y Linux kernel stable tree powerpc/64s: Fix crashes when toggling entry flush barrier 2021-05-19T08:29:49+00:00 Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au 2021-05-06T04:49:59+00:00 dd0d6117052faace5440db20fc37175efe921c7d commit aec86b052df6541cc97c5fca44e5934cbea4963b upstream. The entry flush mitigation can be enabled/disabled at runtime via a debugfs file (entry_flush), which causes the kernel to patch itself to enable/disable the relevant mitigations. However depending on which mitigation we're using, it may not be safe to do that patching while other CPUs are active. For example the following crash: sleeper[15639]: segfault (11) at c000000000004c20 nip c000000000004c20 lr c000000000004c20 Shows that we returned to userspace with a corrupted LR that points into the kernel, due to executing the partially patched call to the fallback entry flush (ie. we missed the LR restore). Fix it by doing the patching under stop machine. The CPUs that aren't doing the patching will be spinning in the core of the stop machine logic. That is currently sufficient for our purposes, because none of the patching we do is to that code or anywhere in the vicinity. Fixes: f79643787e0a ("powerpc/64s: flush L1D on kernel entry") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+ Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210506044959.1298123-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit aec86b052df6541cc97c5fca44e5934cbea4963b upstream.

The entry flush mitigation can be enabled/disabled at runtime via a
debugfs file (entry_flush), which causes the kernel to patch itself to
enable/disable the relevant mitigations.

However depending on which mitigation we're using, it may not be safe to
do that patching while other CPUs are active. For example the following
crash:

  sleeper[15639]: segfault (11) at c000000000004c20 nip c000000000004c20 lr c000000000004c20

Shows that we returned to userspace with a corrupted LR that points into
the kernel, due to executing the partially patched call to the fallback
entry flush (ie. we missed the LR restore).

Fix it by doing the patching under stop machine. The CPUs that aren't
doing the patching will be spinning in the core of the stop machine
logic. That is currently sufficient for our purposes, because none of
the patching we do is to that code or anywhere in the vicinity.

Fixes: f79643787e0a ("powerpc/64s: flush L1D on kernel entry")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210506044959.1298123-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
powerpc/64s: Fix crashes when toggling stf barrier 2021-05-19T08:29:49+00:00 Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au 2021-05-06T04:49:58+00:00 3ee7c54977600dfc63d1e7a61c7c234ad251d066 commit 8ec7791bae1327b1c279c5cd6e929c3b12daaf0a upstream. The STF (store-to-load forwarding) barrier mitigation can be enabled/disabled at runtime via a debugfs file (stf_barrier), which causes the kernel to patch itself to enable/disable the relevant mitigations. However depending on which mitigation we're using, it may not be safe to do that patching while other CPUs are active. For example the following crash: User access of kernel address (c00000003fff5af0) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0) segfault (11) at c00000003fff5af0 nip 7fff8ad12198 lr 7fff8ad121f8 code 1 code: 40820128 e93c00d0 e9290058 7c292840 40810058 38600000 4bfd9a81 e8410018 code: 2c030006 41810154 3860ffb6 e9210098 <e94d8ff0> 7d295279 39400000 40820a3c Shows that we returned to userspace without restoring the user r13 value, due to executing the partially patched STF exit code. Fix it by doing the patching under stop machine. The CPUs that aren't doing the patching will be spinning in the core of the stop machine logic. That is currently sufficient for our purposes, because none of the patching we do is to that code or anywhere in the vicinity. Fixes: a048a07d7f45 ("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel entry/exit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+ Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210506044959.1298123-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8ec7791bae1327b1c279c5cd6e929c3b12daaf0a upstream.

The STF (store-to-load forwarding) barrier mitigation can be
enabled/disabled at runtime via a debugfs file (stf_barrier), which
causes the kernel to patch itself to enable/disable the relevant
mitigations.

However depending on which mitigation we're using, it may not be safe to
do that patching while other CPUs are active. For example the following
crash:

  User access of kernel address (c00000003fff5af0) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
  segfault (11) at c00000003fff5af0 nip 7fff8ad12198 lr 7fff8ad121f8 code 1
  code: 40820128 e93c00d0 e9290058 7c292840 40810058 38600000 4bfd9a81 e8410018
  code: 2c030006 41810154 3860ffb6 e9210098 <e94d8ff0> 7d295279 39400000 40820a3c

Shows that we returned to userspace without restoring the user r13
value, due to executing the partially patched STF exit code.

Fix it by doing the patching under stop machine. The CPUs that aren't
doing the patching will be spinning in the core of the stop machine
logic. That is currently sufficient for our purposes, because none of
the patching we do is to that code or anywhere in the vicinity.

Fixes: a048a07d7f45 ("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel entry/exit")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210506044959.1298123-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
powerpc/iommu: Annotate nested lock for lockdep 2021-05-19T08:29:35+00:00 Alexey Kardashevskiy aik@ozlabs.ru 2021-03-01T06:36:53+00:00 8089cb59dde9515df2877a5cf99e6e366dd09f00 [ Upstream commit cc7130bf119add37f36238343a593b71ef6ecc1e ] The IOMMU table is divided into pools for concurrent mappings and each pool has a separate spinlock. When taking the ownership of an IOMMU group to pass through a device to a VM, we lock these spinlocks which triggers a false negative warning in lockdep (below). This fixes it by annotating the large pool's spinlock as a nest lock which makes lockdep not complaining when locking nested locks if the nest lock is locked already. === WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.11.0-le_syzkaller_a+fstn1 #100 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- qemu-system-ppc/4129 is trying to acquire lock: c0000000119bddb0 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 but task is already holding lock: c0000000119bdd30 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(p->lock)/1); lock(&(p->lock)/1); === Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301063653.51003-1-aik@ozlabs.ru Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit cc7130bf119add37f36238343a593b71ef6ecc1e ]

The IOMMU table is divided into pools for concurrent mappings and each
pool has a separate spinlock. When taking the ownership of an IOMMU group
to pass through a device to a VM, we lock these spinlocks which triggers
a false negative warning in lockdep (below).

This fixes it by annotating the large pool's spinlock as a nest lock
which makes lockdep not complaining when locking nested locks if
the nest lock is locked already.

===
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.11.0-le_syzkaller_a+fstn1 #100 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
qemu-system-ppc/4129 is trying to acquire lock:
c0000000119bddb0 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0

but task is already holding lock:
c0000000119bdd30 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(p->lock)/1);
  lock(&(p->lock)/1);
===

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301063653.51003-1-aik@ozlabs.ru
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/pseries: Stop calling printk in rtas_stop_self() 2021-05-19T08:29:34+00:00 Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au 2021-04-18T13:54:13+00:00 b1acfebf97ac48ba71da2d74e70ed951449369ba [ Upstream commit ed8029d7b472369a010a1901358567ca3b6dbb0d ] RCU complains about us calling printk() from an offline CPU: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1 Not tainted ----------------------------- kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3568 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: RCU used illegally from offline CPU! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by swapper/0/0. stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x124/0x144 __lock_acquire+0x1098/0x28b0 lock_acquire+0x128/0x600 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xc0 down_trylock+0x2c/0x70 __down_trylock_console_sem+0x60/0x140 vprintk_emit+0x1a8/0x4b0 vprintk_func+0xcc/0x200 printk+0x40/0x54 pseries_cpu_offline_self+0xc0/0x120 arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x54/0x70 do_idle+0x174/0x4a0 cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40 rest_init+0x268/0x388 start_kernel+0x748/0x790 start_here_common+0x1c/0x614 Which happens because by the time we get to rtas_stop_self() we are already offline. In addition the message can be spammy, and is not that helpful for users, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210418135413.1204031-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit ed8029d7b472369a010a1901358567ca3b6dbb0d ]

RCU complains about us calling printk() from an offline CPU:

  =============================
  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1 Not tainted
  -----------------------------
  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3568 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

  other info that might help us debug this:

  RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
  rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  no locks held by swapper/0/0.

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7-02874-g7cf90e481cb8 #1
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable)
    lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x124/0x144
    __lock_acquire+0x1098/0x28b0
    lock_acquire+0x128/0x600
    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xc0
    down_trylock+0x2c/0x70
    __down_trylock_console_sem+0x60/0x140
    vprintk_emit+0x1a8/0x4b0
    vprintk_func+0xcc/0x200
    printk+0x40/0x54
    pseries_cpu_offline_self+0xc0/0x120
    arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x54/0x70
    do_idle+0x174/0x4a0
    cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40
    rest_init+0x268/0x388
    start_kernel+0x748/0x790
    start_here_common+0x1c/0x614

Which happens because by the time we get to rtas_stop_self() we are
already offline. In addition the message can be spammy, and is not that
helpful for users, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210418135413.1204031-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask 2021-05-19T08:29:34+00:00 Srikar Dronamraju srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2021-04-01T15:42:00+00:00 a98fe32c03191ab12a47f3c8a3dec9019d547d11 [ Upstream commit 6980d13f0dd189846887bbbfa43793d9a41768d3 ] Geethika reported a trace when doing a dlpar CPU add. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 152 PID: 1134 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2057 CPU: 152 PID: 1134 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-master #5 Workqueue: events cpuset_hotplug_workfn NIP: c0000000001cfc14 LR: c0000000001cfc10 CTR: c0000000007e3420 REGS: c0000034a08eb260 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.12.0-rc5-master+) MSR: 8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28828422 XER: 00000020 CFAR: c0000000001fd888 IRQMASK: 0 #012GPR00: c0000000001cfc10 c0000034a08eb500 c000000001f35400 0000000000000027 #012GPR04: c0000035abaa8010 c0000035abb30a00 0000000000000027 c0000035abaa8018 #012GPR08: 0000000000000023 c0000035abaaef48 00000035aa540000 c0000035a49dffe8 #012GPR12: 0000000028828424 c0000035bf1a1c80 0000000000000497 0000000000000004 #012GPR16: c00000000347a258 0000000000000140 c00000000203d468 c000000001a1a490 #012GPR20: c000000001f9c160 c0000034adf70920 c0000034aec9fd20 0000000100087bd3 #012GPR24: 0000000100087bd3 c0000035b3de09f8 0000000000000030 c0000035b3de09f8 #012GPR28: 0000000000000028 c00000000347a280 c0000034aefe0b00 c0000000010a2a68 NIP [c0000000001cfc14] build_sched_domains+0x6a4/0x1500 LR [c0000000001cfc10] build_sched_domains+0x6a0/0x1500 Call Trace: [c0000034a08eb500] [c0000000001cfc10] build_sched_domains+0x6a0/0x1500 (unreliable) [c0000034a08eb640] [c0000000001d1e6c] partition_sched_domains_locked+0x3ec/0x530 [c0000034a08eb6e0] [c0000000002936d4] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x524/0xbf0 [c0000034a08eb7e0] [c000000000296bb0] rebuild_sched_domains+0x40/0x70 [c0000034a08eb810] [c000000000296e74] cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x294/0xe20 [c0000034a08ebc30] [c000000000178dd0] process_one_work+0x300/0x670 [c0000034a08ebd10] [c0000000001791b8] worker_thread+0x78/0x520 [c0000034a08ebda0] [c000000000185090] kthread+0x1a0/0x1b0 [c0000034a08ebe10] [c00000000000ccec] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 7d2903a6 4e800421 e8410018 7f67db78 7fe6fb78 7f45d378 7f84e378 7c681b78 3c62ff1a 3863c6f8 4802dc35 60000000 <0fe00000> 3920fff4 f9210070 e86100a0 ---[ end trace 532d9066d3d4d7ec ]--- Some of the per-CPU masks use cpu_cpu_mask as a filter to limit the search for related CPUs. On a dlpar add of a CPU, update cpu_cpu_mask before updating the per-CPU masks. This will ensure the cpu_cpu_mask is updated correctly before its used in setting the masks. Setting the numa_node will ensure that when cpu_cpu_mask() gets called, the correct node number is used. This code movement helped fix the above call trace. Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401154200.150077-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6980d13f0dd189846887bbbfa43793d9a41768d3 ]

Geethika reported a trace when doing a dlpar CPU add.

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 152 PID: 1134 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2057
CPU: 152 PID: 1134 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-master #5
Workqueue: events cpuset_hotplug_workfn
NIP:  c0000000001cfc14 LR: c0000000001cfc10 CTR: c0000000007e3420
REGS: c0000034a08eb260 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (5.12.0-rc5-master+)
MSR:  8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28828422  XER: 00000020
CFAR: c0000000001fd888 IRQMASK: 0 #012GPR00: c0000000001cfc10
c0000034a08eb500 c000000001f35400 0000000000000027 #012GPR04:
c0000035abaa8010 c0000035abb30a00 0000000000000027 c0000035abaa8018
#012GPR08: 0000000000000023 c0000035abaaef48 00000035aa540000
c0000035a49dffe8 #012GPR12: 0000000028828424 c0000035bf1a1c80
0000000000000497 0000000000000004 #012GPR16: c00000000347a258
0000000000000140 c00000000203d468 c000000001a1a490 #012GPR20:
c000000001f9c160 c0000034adf70920 c0000034aec9fd20 0000000100087bd3
#012GPR24: 0000000100087bd3 c0000035b3de09f8 0000000000000030
c0000035b3de09f8 #012GPR28: 0000000000000028 c00000000347a280
c0000034aefe0b00 c0000000010a2a68
NIP [c0000000001cfc14] build_sched_domains+0x6a4/0x1500
LR [c0000000001cfc10] build_sched_domains+0x6a0/0x1500
Call Trace:
[c0000034a08eb500] [c0000000001cfc10] build_sched_domains+0x6a0/0x1500 (unreliable)
[c0000034a08eb640] [c0000000001d1e6c] partition_sched_domains_locked+0x3ec/0x530
[c0000034a08eb6e0] [c0000000002936d4] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x524/0xbf0
[c0000034a08eb7e0] [c000000000296bb0] rebuild_sched_domains+0x40/0x70
[c0000034a08eb810] [c000000000296e74] cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x294/0xe20
[c0000034a08ebc30] [c000000000178dd0] process_one_work+0x300/0x670
[c0000034a08ebd10] [c0000000001791b8] worker_thread+0x78/0x520
[c0000034a08ebda0] [c000000000185090] kthread+0x1a0/0x1b0
[c0000034a08ebe10] [c00000000000ccec] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70
Instruction dump:
7d2903a6 4e800421 e8410018 7f67db78 7fe6fb78 7f45d378 7f84e378 7c681b78
3c62ff1a 3863c6f8 4802dc35 60000000 <0fe00000> 3920fff4 f9210070 e86100a0
---[ end trace 532d9066d3d4d7ec ]---

Some of the per-CPU masks use cpu_cpu_mask as a filter to limit the search
for related CPUs. On a dlpar add of a CPU, update cpu_cpu_mask before
updating the per-CPU masks. This will ensure the cpu_cpu_mask is updated
correctly before its used in setting the masks. Setting the numa_node will
ensure that when cpu_cpu_mask() gets called, the correct node number is
used. This code movement helped fix the above call trace.

Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401154200.150077-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/xive: Use the "ibm, chip-id" property only under PowerNV 2021-05-19T08:29:33+00:00 Cédric Le Goater clg@kaod.org 2021-04-13T13:03:52+00:00 abd822deec9ec040e3d41a23a7b5a15bee0cf7eb [ Upstream commit e9e16917bc388846163b8566a298a291d71e44c9 ] The 'chip_id' field of the XIVE CPU structure is used to choose a target for a source located on the same chip. For that, the XIVE driver queries the chip identifier from the "ibm,chip-id" property and compares it to a 'src_chip' field identifying the chip of a source. This information is only available on the PowerNV platform, 'src_chip' being assigned to XIVE_INVALID_CHIP_ID under pSeries. The "ibm,chip-id" property is also not available on all platforms. It was first introduced on PowerNV and later, under QEMU for pSeries/KVM. However, the property is not part of PAPR and does not exist under pSeries/PowerVM. Assign 'chip_id' to XIVE_INVALID_CHIP_ID by default and let the PowerNV platform override the value with the "ibm,chip-id" property. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210413130352.1183267-1-clg@kaod.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit e9e16917bc388846163b8566a298a291d71e44c9 ]

The 'chip_id' field of the XIVE CPU structure is used to choose a
target for a source located on the same chip. For that, the XIVE
driver queries the chip identifier from the "ibm,chip-id" property
and compares it to a 'src_chip' field identifying the chip of a
source. This information is only available on the PowerNV platform,
'src_chip' being assigned to XIVE_INVALID_CHIP_ID under pSeries.

The "ibm,chip-id" property is also not available on all platforms. It
was first introduced on PowerNV and later, under QEMU for pSeries/KVM.
However, the property is not part of PAPR and does not exist under
pSeries/PowerVM.

Assign 'chip_id' to XIVE_INVALID_CHIP_ID by default and let the
PowerNV platform override the value with the "ibm,chip-id" property.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210413130352.1183267-1-clg@kaod.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/mm: Add cond_resched() while removing hpte mappings 2021-05-19T08:29:32+00:00 Vaibhav Jain vaibhav@linux.ibm.com 2021-04-04T16:31:48+00:00 d33a0894ce6ce7f0b8e5c7e875cdf7a74d0caa0c [ Upstream commit a5d6a3e73acbd619dd5b7b831762b755f9e2db80 ] While removing large number of mappings from hash page tables for large memory systems as soft-lockup is reported because of the time spent inside htap_remove_mapping() like one below: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 23s! <snip> NIP plpar_hcall+0x38/0x58 LR pSeries_lpar_hpte_invalidate+0x68/0xb0 Call Trace: 0x1fffffffffff000 (unreliable) pSeries_lpar_hpte_removebolted+0x9c/0x230 hash__remove_section_mapping+0xec/0x1c0 remove_section_mapping+0x28/0x3c arch_remove_memory+0xfc/0x150 devm_memremap_pages_release+0x180/0x2f0 devm_action_release+0x30/0x50 release_nodes+0x28c/0x300 device_release_driver_internal+0x16c/0x280 unbind_store+0x124/0x170 drv_attr_store+0x44/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0x90 kernfs_fop_write+0x1b0/0x290 __vfs_write+0x3c/0x70 vfs_write+0xd4/0x270 ksys_write+0xdc/0x130 system_call+0x5c/0x70 Fix this by adding a cond_resched() to the loop in htap_remove_mapping() that issues hcall to remove hpte mapping. The call to cond_resched() is issued every HZ jiffies which should prevent the soft-lockup from being reported. Suggested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210404163148.321346-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a5d6a3e73acbd619dd5b7b831762b755f9e2db80 ]

While removing large number of mappings from hash page tables for
large memory systems as soft-lockup is reported because of the time
spent inside htap_remove_mapping() like one below:

 watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 23s!
 <snip>
 NIP plpar_hcall+0x38/0x58
 LR  pSeries_lpar_hpte_invalidate+0x68/0xb0
 Call Trace:
  0x1fffffffffff000 (unreliable)
  pSeries_lpar_hpte_removebolted+0x9c/0x230
  hash__remove_section_mapping+0xec/0x1c0
  remove_section_mapping+0x28/0x3c
  arch_remove_memory+0xfc/0x150
  devm_memremap_pages_release+0x180/0x2f0
  devm_action_release+0x30/0x50
  release_nodes+0x28c/0x300
  device_release_driver_internal+0x16c/0x280
  unbind_store+0x124/0x170
  drv_attr_store+0x44/0x60
  sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0x90
  kernfs_fop_write+0x1b0/0x290
  __vfs_write+0x3c/0x70
  vfs_write+0xd4/0x270
  ksys_write+0xdc/0x130
  system_call+0x5c/0x70

Fix this by adding a cond_resched() to the loop in
htap_remove_mapping() that issues hcall to remove hpte mapping. The
call to cond_resched() is issued every HZ jiffies which should prevent
the soft-lockup from being reported.

Suggested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210404163148.321346-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/32: Statically initialise first emergency context 2021-05-19T08:29:29+00:00 Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu 2021-03-12T12:50:25+00:00 2e16f00251065ae242a0a94f2eeaa8212ea14736 [ Upstream commit a4719f5bb6d7dc220bffdc1b9f5ce5eaa5543581 ] The check of the emergency context initialisation in vmap_stack_overflow is buggy for the SMP case, as it compares r1 with 0 while in the SMP case r1 is offseted by the CPU id. Instead of fixing it, just perform static initialisation of the first emergency context. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4a67ba422be75713286dca0c86ee0d3df2eb6dfa.1615552867.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a4719f5bb6d7dc220bffdc1b9f5ce5eaa5543581 ]

The check of the emergency context initialisation in
vmap_stack_overflow is buggy for the SMP case, as it
compares r1 with 0 while in the SMP case r1 is offseted
by the CPU id.

Instead of fixing it, just perform static initialisation
of the first emergency context.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4a67ba422be75713286dca0c86ee0d3df2eb6dfa.1615552867.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/52xx: Fix an invalid ASM expression ('addi' used instead of 'add') 2021-05-14T08:50:16+00:00 Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu 2021-04-21T17:24:03+00:00 370d557605b4587b1322caa001cd698ac2110f67 [ Upstream commit 8a87a507714386efc39c3ae6fa24d4f79846b522 ] AS arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.o arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.S: Assembler messages: arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.S:184: Warning: invalid register expression In the following code, 'addi' is wrong, has to be 'add' /* local udelay in sram is needed */ udelay: /* r11 - tb_ticks_per_usec, r12 - usecs, overwrites r13 */ mullw r12, r12, r11 mftb r13 /* start */ addi r12, r13, r12 /* end */ Fixes: ee983079ce04 ("[POWERPC] MPC5200 low power mode") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cb4cec9131c8577803367f1699209a7e104cec2a.1619025821.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 8a87a507714386efc39c3ae6fa24d4f79846b522 ]

  AS      arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.S: Assembler messages:
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200_sleep.S:184: Warning: invalid register expression

In the following code, 'addi' is wrong, has to be 'add'

	/* local udelay in sram is needed */
  udelay: /* r11 - tb_ticks_per_usec, r12 - usecs, overwrites r13 */
	mullw	r12, r12, r11
	mftb	r13	/* start */
	addi	r12, r13, r12 /* end */

Fixes: ee983079ce04 ("[POWERPC] MPC5200 low power mode")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cb4cec9131c8577803367f1699209a7e104cec2a.1619025821.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
powerpc/perf: Fix the threshold event selection for memory events in power10 2021-05-14T08:50:16+00:00 Athira Rajeev atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2021-03-04T06:40:15+00:00 2b52aae53a94fecacf8d287af4ac685926494bca [ Upstream commit 66d9b7492887d34c711bc05b36c22438acba51b4 ] Memory events (mem-loads and mem-stores) currently use the threshold event selection as issue to finish. Power10 supports issue to complete as part of thresholding which is more appropriate for mem-loads and mem-stores. Hence fix the event code for memory events to use issue to complete. Fixes: a64e697cef23 ("powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support") Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614840015-1535-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 66d9b7492887d34c711bc05b36c22438acba51b4 ]

Memory events (mem-loads and mem-stores) currently use the threshold
event selection as issue to finish. Power10 supports issue to complete
as part of thresholding which is more appropriate for mem-loads and
mem-stores. Hence fix the event code for memory events to use issue
to complete.

Fixes: a64e697cef23 ("powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support")
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614840015-1535-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>