linux-stable.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm, branch linux-3.12.y

KVM: PPC: Book3s PR: Allow access to unprivileged MMCR2 register

2016-10-17T07:46:19+00:00

commit fa73c3b25bd8d0d393dc6109a1dba3c2aef0451e upstream.

The MMCR2 register is available twice, one time with number 785
(privileged access), and one time with number 769 (unprivileged,
but it can be disabled completely). In former times, the Linux
kernel was using the unprivileged register 769 only, but since
commit 8dd75ccb571f3c92c ("powerpc: Use privileged SPR number
for MMCR2"), it uses the privileged register 785 instead.
The KVM-PR code then of course also switched to use the SPR 785,
but this is causing older guest kernels to crash, since these
kernels still access 769 instead. So to support older kernels
with KVM-PR again, we have to support register 769 in KVM-PR, too.

Fixes: 8dd75ccb571f3c92c48014b3dabd3d51a115ab41
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

ppc32: fix copy_from_user()

2016-09-29T09:14:38+00:00

commit 224264657b8b228f949b42346e09ed8c90136a8e upstream.

should clear on access_ok() failures.  Also remove the useless
range truncation logics.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc: Use privileged SPR number for MMCR2

2016-07-12T09:27:48+00:00

commit 8dd75ccb571f3c92c48014b3dabd3d51a115ab41 upstream.

We are already using the privileged versions of MMCR0, MMCR1
and MMCRA in the kernel, so for MMCR2, we should better use
the privileged versions, too, to be consistent.

Fixes: 240686c13687 ("powerpc: Initialise PMU related regs on Power8")
Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc: Fix definition of SIAR and SDAR registers

2016-07-12T09:27:48+00:00

commit d23fac2b27d94aeb7b65536a50d32bfdc21fe01e upstream.

The SIAR and SDAR registers are available twice, one time as SPRs
780 / 781 (unprivileged, but read-only), and one time as the SPRs
796 / 797 (privileged, but read and write). The Linux kernel code
currently uses the unprivileged  SPRs - while this is OK for reading,
writing to that register of course does not work.
Since the KVM code tries to write to this register, too (see the mtspr
in book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S), the contents of this register sometimes get
lost for the guests, e.g. during migration of a VM.
To fix this issue, simply switch to the privileged SPR numbers instead.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc: Make {cmp}xchg* and their atomic_ versions fully ordered

2016-02-12T07:57:57+00:00

commit 81d7a3294de7e9828310bbf986a67246b13fa01e upstream.

According to memory-barriers.txt, xchg*, cmpxchg* and their atomic_
versions all need to be fully ordered, however they are now just
RELEASE+ACQUIRE, which are not fully ordered.

So also replace PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER and PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER with
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER and PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER in
__{cmp,}xchg_{u32,u64} respectively to guarantee fully ordered semantics
of atomic{,64}_{cmp,}xchg() and {cmp,}xchg(), as a complement of commit
b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")

This patch depends on patch "powerpc: Make value-returning atomics fully
ordered" for PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER definition.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng 
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc: Make value-returning atomics fully ordered

2016-02-12T07:57:57+00:00

commit 49e9cf3f0c04bf76ffa59242254110309554861d upstream.

According to memory-barriers.txt:

> Any atomic operation that modifies some state in memory and returns
> information about the state (old or new) implies an SMP-conditional
> general memory barrier (smp_mb()) on each side of the actual
> operation ...

Which mean these operations should be fully ordered. However on PPC,
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER is the barrier before the actual operation,
which is currently "lwsync" if SMP=y. The leading "lwsync" can not
guarantee fully ordered atomics, according to Paul Mckenney:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/14/970

To fix this, we define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER as "sync" to guarantee
the fully-ordered semantics.

This also makes futex atomics fully ordered, which can avoid possible
memory ordering problems if userspace code relies on futex system call
for fully ordered semantics.

Fixes: b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng 
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc/tm: Block signal return setting invalid MSR state

2016-02-12T07:57:56+00:00

commit d2b9d2a5ad5ef04ff978c9923d19730cb05efd55 upstream.

Currently we allow both the MSR T and S bits to be set by userspace on
a signal return.  Unfortunately this is a reserved configuration and
will cause a TM Bad Thing exception if attempted (via rfid).

This patch checks for this case in both the 32 and 64 bit signals
code.  If both T and S are set, we mark the context as invalid.

Found using a syscall fuzzer.

Fixes: 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state to the signal context")
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc/pseries: Fix dedicated processor partition detection

2015-11-14T16:48:50+00:00

commit 733187e29576041ceccf3b82092ca900fc929170 upstream.

commit f13c13a00512 (powerpc: Stop using non-architected shared_proc
field in lppaca) fixed a potential issue with shared/dedicated
partition detection. The old method of detection relied on an
unarchitected field (shared_proc), and this patch switched
to using something architected (a non zero yield_count).

Unfortunately the assertion in the Linux header that yield_count
is only non zero on shared processor partitions is not true. It
turns out dedicated processor partitions can increment yield_count
and as such we falsely detect dedicated partitions as shared.

Fix the comment, and switch back to using the old method.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard 
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc/rtas: Introduce rtas_get_sensor_fast() for IRQ handlers

2015-09-30T09:00:07+00:00

commit 1c2cb594441d02815d304cccec9742ff5c707495 upstream.

The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers like the EPOW handler!
This leads to the following BUG when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is
enabled:

 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:496
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
 CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc2-thuth #6
 Call Trace:
 [c00000007ffe7b90] [c000000000807670] dump_stack+0xa0/0xdc (unreliable)
 [c00000007ffe7bc0] [c0000000000e1f14] ___might_sleep+0x134/0x180
 [c00000007ffe7c20] [c00000000002aec0] rtas_busy_delay+0x30/0xd0
 [c00000007ffe7c50] [c00000000002bde4] rtas_get_sensor+0x74/0xe0
 [c00000007ffe7ce0] [c000000000083264] ras_epow_interrupt+0x44/0x450
 [c00000007ffe7d90] [c000000000120260] handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa0/0x300
 [c00000007ffe7e70] [c000000000120524] handle_irq_event+0x64/0xc0
 [c00000007ffe7eb0] [c000000000124dbc] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xec/0x260
 [c00000007ffe7ef0] [c00000000011f4f0] generic_handle_irq+0x50/0x80
 [c00000007ffe7f20] [c000000000010f3c] __do_irq+0x8c/0x200
 [c00000007ffe7f90] [c0000000000236cc] call_do_irq+0x14/0x24
 [c00000007e6f39e0] [c000000000011144] do_IRQ+0x94/0x110
 [c00000007e6f3a30] [c000000000002594] hardware_interrupt_common+0x114/0x180

Fix this issue by introducing a new rtas_get_sensor_fast() function
that does not use rtas_busy_delay() - and thus can only be used for
sensors that do not cause a BUSY condition - known as "fast" sensors.

The EPOW sensor is defined to be "fast" in sPAPR - mpe.

Fixes: 587f83e8dd50 ("powerpc/pseries: Use rtas_get_sensor in RAS code")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
Reviewed-by: Nathan Fontenot 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby

powerpc/mm: Fix pte_pagesize_index() crash on 4K w/64K hash

2015-09-30T09:00:06+00:00

commit 74b5037baa2011a2799e2c43adde7d171b072f9e upstream.

The powerpc kernel can be built to have either a 4K PAGE_SIZE or a 64K
PAGE_SIZE.

However when built with a 4K PAGE_SIZE there is an additional config
option which can be enabled, PPC_HAS_HASH_64K, which means the kernel
also knows how to hash a 64K page even though the base PAGE_SIZE is 4K.

This is used in one obscure configuration, to support 64K pages for SPU
local store on the Cell processor when the rest of the kernel is using
4K pages.

In this configuration, pte_pagesize_index() is defined to just pass
through its arguments to get_slice_psize(). However pte_pagesize_index()
is called for both user and kernel addresses, whereas get_slice_psize()
only knows how to handle user addresses.

This has been broken forever, however until recently it happened to
work. That was because in get_slice_psize() the large kernel address
would cause the right shift of the slice mask to return zero.

However in commit 7aa0727f3302 ("powerpc/mm: Increase the slice range to
64TB"), the get_slice_psize() code was changed so that instead of a
right shift we do an array lookup based on the address. When passed a
kernel address this means we index way off the end of the slice array
and return random junk.

That is only fatal if we happen to hit something non-zero, but when we
do return a non-zero value we confuse the MMU code and eventually cause
a check stop.

This fix is ugly, but simple. When we're called for a kernel address we
return 4K, which is always correct in this configuration, otherwise we
use the slice mask.

Fixes: 7aa0727f3302 ("powerpc/mm: Increase the slice range to 64TB")
Reported-by: Cyril Bur 
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby