Pull more fallthrough fixes from Gustavo A. R. Silva:
 "Fix fall-through warnings on arm and mips for multiple configurations"

* tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.3-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux:
  video: fbdev: acornfb: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: libsas: sas_discover: Mark expected switch fall-through
  MIPS: Octeon: Mark expected switch fall-through
  power: supply: ab8500_charger: Mark expected switch fall-through
  watchdog: wdt285: Mark expected switch fall-through
  mtd: sa1100: Mark expected switch fall-through
  drm/sun4i: tcon: Mark expected switch fall-through
  drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Mark expected switch fall-through
  ARM: riscpc: Mark expected switch fall-through
  dmaengine: fsldma: Mark expected switch fall-through

Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Fix the following warning (Building: cavium_octeon_defconfig mips):

arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx-sli-defs.h:47:6: warning: this statement
may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

Pull kvm fixes from Paolo Bonzini:
 "Bugfixes (arm and x86) and cleanups"

* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm:
  selftests: kvm: Adding config fragments
  KVM: selftests: Update gitignore file for latest changes
  kvm: remove unnecessary PageReserved check
  KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Reevaluate level sensitive interrupts on enable
  KVM: arm: Don't write junk to CP15 registers on reset
  KVM: arm64: Don't write junk to sysregs on reset
  KVM: arm/arm64: Sync ICH_VMCR_EL2 back when about to block
  x86: kvm: remove useless calls to kvm_para_available
  KVM: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  KVM: remove kvm_arch_has_vcpu_debugfs()
  KVM: Fix leak vCPU's VMCS value into other pCPU
  KVM: Check preempted_in_kernel for involuntary preemption
  KVM: LAPIC: Don't need to wakeup vCPU twice afer timer fire
  arm64: KVM: hyp: debug-sr: Mark expected switch fall-through
  KVM: arm64: Update kvm_arm_exception_class and esr_class_str for new EC
  KVM: arm: vgic-v3: Mark expected switch fall-through
  arm64: KVM: regmap: Fix unexpected switch fall-through
  KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce kvm_pmu_vcpu_init() to setup PMU counter index

KVM/arm fixes for 5.3

- A bunch of switch/case fall-through annotation, fixing one actual bug
- Fix PMU reset bug
- Add missing exception class debug strings

Pull MIPS fixes from Paul Burton:
 "A few MIPS fixes for 5.3:

   - Various switch fall through annotations to fixup warnings & errors
     resulting from -Wimplicit-fallthrough.

   - A fix for systems (at least jazz) using an i8253 PIT as clocksource
     when it's not suitably configured.

   - Set struct cacheinfo's cpu_map_populated field to true, indicating
     that we filled in cache info detected from cop0 registers &
     avoiding complaints about that info being (intentionally) missing
     in devicetree"

* tag 'mips_fixes_5.3_1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux:
  MIPS: BCM63XX: Mark expected switch fall-through
  MIPS: OProfile: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  MIPS: Annotate fall-through in Cavium Octeon code
  MIPS: Annotate fall-through in kvm/emulate.c
  mips: fix cacheinfo
  MIPS: kernel: only use i8253 clocksource with periodic clockevent

Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warning (Building: bcm63xx_defconfig mips):

arch/mips/pci/ops-bcm63xx.c: In function ‘bcm63xx_pcie_can_access’:
arch/mips/pci/ops-bcm63xx.c:474:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0)
      ^
arch/mips/pci/ops-bcm63xx.c:477:2: note: here
  default:
  ^~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

There is no need for this function as all arches have to implement
kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs() no matter what.  A #define symbol
let us actually simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

ARM64 randdconfig builds regularly run into a build error, especially
when NUMA_BALANCING and SPARSEMEM are enabled but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP:

  #error "KASAN: not enough bits in page flags for tag"

The last-cpuid bits are already contitional on the available space, so
the result of the calculation is a bit random on whether they were
already left out or not.

Adding the kasan tag bits before last-cpuid makes it much more likely to
end up with a successful build here, and should be reliable for
randconfig at least, as long as that does not randomize NR_CPUS or
NODES_SHIFT but uses the defaults.

In order for the modified check to not trigger in the x86 vdso32 code
where all constants are wrong (building with -m32), enclose all the
definitions with an #ifdef.

[arnd@arndb.de: build fix]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAK8P3a3Mno1SWTcuAOT0Wa9VS15pdU6EfnkxLbDpyS55yO04+g@mail.gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722115520.3743282-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190618095347.3850490-1-arnd@arndb.de/
Fixes: 2813b9c02962 ("kasan, mm, arm64: tag non slab memory allocated via pagealloc")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warning (Building: mips):

arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_stop’:
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:217:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl3(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:218:2: note: here
  case 3:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:219:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl2(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:220:2: note: here
  case 2:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:221:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl1(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:222:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_start’:
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:197:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl3(WHAT | reg.control[3]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:198:2: note: here
  case 3:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:199:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl2(WHAT | reg.control[2]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:200:2: note: here
  case 2:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:201:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfctrl1(WHAT | reg.control[1]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:202:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘reset_counters’:
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:299:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr3(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:300:2: note: here
  case 3:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:302:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr2(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:303:2: note: here
  case 2:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:305:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr1(0);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:306:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_perfcount_handler’:
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) &&   \
      ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:248:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(3)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here
  case n + 1:       \
  ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:249:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(2)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) &&   \
      ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:249:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(2)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here
  case n + 1:       \
  ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:250:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(1)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:242:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if ((control & MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE) &&   \
      ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:250:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(1)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:239:2: note: here
  case n + 1:       \
  ^
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:251:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘HANDLE_COUNTER’
  HANDLE_COUNTER(0)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  CC      usr/include/linux/pmu.h.s
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c: In function ‘mipsxx_cpu_setup’:
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:174:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr3(reg.counter[3]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:175:2: note: here
  case 3:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:177:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr2(reg.counter[2]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:178:2: note: here
  case 2:
  ^~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:180:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   w_c0_perfcntr1(reg.counter[1]);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c:181:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: oprofile-list@lists.sf.net
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

There's an intentional switch case fall-through in Cavium Octeon USB
code, which triggers compile errors with -Wimplicit-fallthrough due to
-Werror being enabled for arch/mips.

This can be encountered when building cavium_octeon_defconfig.

Fix the build issue by annotating the intentional fall-through.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org