linux-stable.git/arch/m68k/include/asm/processor.h, branch linux-4.4.y

arch, locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-07-17T10:32:47+00:00

The arch_mutex_cpu_relax() function, introduced by 34b133f, is
hacky and ugly. It was added a few years ago to address the fact
that common cpu_relax() calls include yielding on s390, and thus
impact the optimistic spinning functionality of mutexes. Nowadays
we use this function well beyond mutexes: rwsem, qrwlock, mcs and
lockref. Since the macro that defines the call is in the mutex header,
any users must include mutex.h and the naming is misleading as well.

This patch (i) renames the call to cpu_relax_lowlatency  ("relax, but
only if you can do it with very low latency") and (ii) defines it in
each arch's asm/processor.h local header, just like for regular cpu_relax
functions. On all archs, except s390, cpu_relax_lowlatency is simply cpu_relax,
and thus we can take it out of mutex.h. While this can seem redundant,
I believe it is a good choice as it allows us to move out arch specific
logic from generic locking primitives and enables future(?) archs to
transparently define it, similarly to System Z.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Anton Blanchard 
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Bharat Bhushan 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Chen Liqin 
Cc: Chris Metcalf 
Cc: Christian Borntraeger 
Cc: Chris Zankel 
Cc: David Howells 
Cc: David S. Miller 
Cc: Deepthi Dharwar 
Cc: Dominik Dingel 
Cc: Fenghua Yu 
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Cc: Guan Xuetao 
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen 
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Helge Deller 
Cc: Hirokazu Takata 
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky 
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley 
Cc: James Hogan 
Cc: Jason Wang 
Cc: Jesper Nilsson 
Cc: Joe Perches 
Cc: Jonas Bonn 
Cc: Joseph Myers 
Cc: Kees Cook 
Cc: Koichi Yasutake 
Cc: Lennox Wu 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Mark Salter 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Matt Turner 
Cc: Max Filippov 
Cc: Michael Neuling 
Cc: Michal Simek 
Cc: Mikael Starvik 
Cc: Nicolas Pitre 
Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Paul Burton 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Paul Gortmaker 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Qais Yousef 
Cc: Qiaowei Ren 
Cc: Rafael Wysocki 
Cc: Ralf Baechle 
Cc: Richard Henderson 
Cc: Richard Kuo 
Cc: Russell King 
Cc: Steven Miao 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Stratos Karafotis 
Cc: Tim Chen 
Cc: Tony Luck 
Cc: Vasily Kulikov 
Cc: Vineet Gupta 
Cc: Vineet Gupta 
Cc: Waiman Long 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: Wolfram Sang 
Cc: adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-am33-list@redhat.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net
Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org
Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1404079773.2619.4.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

m68knommu: fix trap on execing /bin/init

2013-02-06T01:13:23+00:00

As of commit fea82210 ("m68k: switch to saner kernel_execve() semantics")
the non-mmu m68k targets have trapped on booting. The execing of /bin/init
causes the exec path to try and return through a 0x0 return address - thus
trapping or otherwise hanging or crashing.

The problem isn't in the exec path as such though, but rather in the
m68knommu start_thread() macro. It is trying to clear the a6 register that
it assumes is part of a struct switch_stack below the thread registers on
our stack. But that is not what the stack frames look like when this is run.
So it ends up corrupting our call stack and zeroing out a function return
address that is sitting there.

The clearing of a6 was introduced many years ago in commit 7bf9a37d8d
("m68knommu: force stack alignment on ColdFire"). It used to work because
the kernel init exec code path had a short cut back to the exception return
code, and it didn't need to return through the calls on the stack.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer

m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()

2012-10-01T04:44:44+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

m68k: always set stack frame format for ColdFire on thread start

2012-10-01T04:44:43+00:00

The stack frame "format" field needs to be explicitly set on thread creation
on ColdFire. For a normal long word aligned user stack pointer the frame
format is 0x4.

We were doing this for non-MMU ColdFire, but not for the case with MMU enabled.
So fix it so we always do it if targeting ColdFire.

The old code happend to rely on the stack frame format being inhereted from
the process calling exec. Furture changes means that may not always work,
so we really do want to set it explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fork: move the real prepare_to_copy() users to arch_dup_task_struct()

2012-05-16T22:16:26+00:00

Historical prepare_to_copy() is mostly a no-op, duplicated for majority of
the architectures and the rest following the x86 model of flushing the extended
register state like fpu there.

Remove it and use the arch_dup_task_struct() instead.

Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov 
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1336692811-30576-1-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: David Howells 
Cc: Koichi Yasutake 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Paul Mundt 
Cc: Chris Zankel 
Cc: Richard Henderson 
Cc: Russell King 
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen 
Cc: Mike Frysinger 
Cc: Mark Salter 
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot 
Cc: Mikael Starvik 
Cc: Yoshinori Sato 
Cc: Richard Kuo 
Cc: Tony Luck 
Cc: Michal Simek 
Cc: Ralf Baechle 
Cc: Jonas Bonn 
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley 
Cc: Helge Deller 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Chen Liqin 
Cc: Lennox Wu 
Cc: David S. Miller 
Cc: Chris Metcalf 
Cc: Jeff Dike 
Cc: Richard Weinberger 
Cc: Guan Xuetao 
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin

m68k: add TASK definitions for ColdFires running with MMU

2011-12-30T00:20:20+00:00

Add appropriate TASK_SIZE and TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE definitions for running
on ColdFire V4e cores with MMU enabled.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer 
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Acked-by: Matt Waddel 
Acked-by: Kurt Mahan

m68k: remove thread_info struct from thread struct

2011-12-24T11:47:56+00:00

Currently on m68k we have a comeplete thread_info structure stored inside
of the thread_struct, and we also have it in the initial part of the kernel
stack. Mostly the code currently uses the one inside of the thread_struct,
only using the "task" pointer from the stack based one.

This is wasteful and confusing, we should only have the single instance of
thread_info inside the stack page. And this is the norm for all other
architectures.

This change makes m68k handle thread_info consistently on both MMU enabled
and non-MMU setups.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer

m68k: merge the mmu and non-mmu traps.c files

2011-10-18T04:22:25+00:00

The code for handling traps in the non-mmu case is a subset of the mmu
enabled case. Merge the non-mmu traps_no.c code back to a single traps.c.
There is actually no code mmu specific here at all, and the processor
specific code (for the more complex 68020/68030/68040/68060) is already
proplerly conditionaly used.

The format of console exception dump is a little different, but I don't
think will cause any one problems, it is purely for debug purposes.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer

m68k, exec: remove redundant set_fs(USER_DS)

2011-07-26T03:57:12+00:00

The address limit is already set in flush_old_exec() so those calls to
set_fs(USER_DS) are redundant.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause 
Cc: Greg Ungerer 
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

m68k: Add helper function handle_kernel_fault()

2011-03-16T18:10:40+00:00

Add helper function handle_kernel_fault() in signal.c, so frame_extra_sizes
can become static, and to avoid future code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel 
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven