linux-stable.git/arch/arm, branch v3.4.41 Linux kernel stable tree ARM: cns3xxx: fix mapping of private memory region 2013-04-05T17:04:35+00:00 Mac Lin mkl0301@gmail.com 2013-03-25T09:23:33+00:00 c14d7523633171e0a950047fe729ec2190c690b0 commit a3d9052c6296ad3398d3ad649c3c682c3e7ecfa6 upstream. Since commit 0536bdf33faf (ARM: move iotable mappings within the vmalloc region), the Cavium CNS3xxx cannot boot anymore. This is caused by the pre-defined iotable mappings is not in the vmalloc region. This patch move the iotable mappings into the vmalloc region, and merge the MPCore private memory region (containing the SCU, the GIC and the TWD) as a single region. Signed-off-by: Mac Lin <mkl0301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit a3d9052c6296ad3398d3ad649c3c682c3e7ecfa6 upstream.

Since commit 0536bdf33faf (ARM: move iotable mappings within the vmalloc
region), the Cavium CNS3xxx cannot boot anymore.

This is caused by the pre-defined iotable mappings is not in the vmalloc
region. This patch move the iotable mappings into the vmalloc region, and
merge the MPCore private memory region (containing the SCU, the GIC and
the TWD) as a single region.

Signed-off-by: Mac Lin <mkl0301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
signal: Define __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER so we know whether to clear sa_restorer 2013-04-05T17:04:14+00:00 Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk 2012-11-26T03:24:19+00:00 556ba7075b9b95a0439cd7b52a1284b88b8fa755 Vaguely based on upstream commit 574c4866e33d 'consolidate kernel-side struct sigaction declarations'. flush_signal_handlers() needs to know whether sigaction::sa_restorer is defined, not whether SA_RESTORER is defined. Define the __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER macro to indicate this. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Vaguely based on upstream commit 574c4866e33d 'consolidate kernel-side
struct sigaction declarations'.

flush_signal_handlers() needs to know whether sigaction::sa_restorer
is defined, not whether SA_RESTORER is defined.  Define the
__ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER macro to indicate this.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: 7663/1: perf: fix ARMv7 EVTYPE_MASK to include NSH bit 2013-03-14T18:29:50+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2013-02-28T16:49:11+00:00 724285cf2c0ef53c2217a6a866ab50d57c386292 commit f2fe09b055e2549de41fb107b34c60bac4a1b0cf upstream. Masked out PMXEVTYPER.NSH means that we can't enable profiling at PL2, regardless of the settings in the HDCR. This patch fixes the broken mask. Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f2fe09b055e2549de41fb107b34c60bac4a1b0cf upstream.

Masked out PMXEVTYPER.NSH means that we can't enable profiling at PL2,
regardless of the settings in the HDCR.

This patch fixes the broken mask.

Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: fix scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code 2013-03-14T18:29:41+00:00 Russell King rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk 2013-02-25T16:10:42+00:00 b9dfac7b1a9263181f7027285d5335f25b1eabfd commit b255188f90e2bade1bd11a986dd1ca4861869f4d upstream. Paolo Pisati reports that IPv6 triggers this warning: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x40000100 Modules linked in: [<c001b1c4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0503c5c>] (__schedule_bug+0x48/0x5c) [<c0503c5c>] (__schedule_bug+0x48/0x5c) from [<c0508608>] (__schedule+0x700/0x740) [<c0508608>] (__schedule+0x700/0x740) from [<c007007c>] (__cond_resched+0x24/0x34) [<c007007c>] (__cond_resched+0x24/0x34) from [<c05086dc>] (_cond_resched+0x3c/0x44) [<c05086dc>] (_cond_resched+0x3c/0x44) from [<c0021f6c>] (do_alignment+0x178/0x78c) [<c0021f6c>] (do_alignment+0x178/0x78c) from [<c00083e0>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98) [<c00083e0>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98) from [<c0509a60>] (__dabt_svc+0x40/0x60) Exception stack(0xc0763d70 to 0xc0763db8) 3d60: e97e805e e97e806e 2c000000 11000000 3d80: ea86bb00 0000002c 00000011 e97e807e c076d2a8 e97e805e e97e806e 0000002c 3da0: 3d000000 c0763dbc c04b98fc c02a8490 00000113 ffffffff [<c0509a60>] (__dabt_svc+0x40/0x60) from [<c02a8490>] (__csum_ipv6_magic+0x8/0xc8) Fix this by using probe_kernel_address() stead of __get_user(). Reported-by: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@gmail.com> Tested-by: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b255188f90e2bade1bd11a986dd1ca4861869f4d upstream.

Paolo Pisati reports that IPv6 triggers this warning:

BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x40000100
Modules linked in:
[<c001b1c4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0503c5c>] (__schedule_bug+0x48/0x5c)
[<c0503c5c>] (__schedule_bug+0x48/0x5c) from [<c0508608>] (__schedule+0x700/0x740)
[<c0508608>] (__schedule+0x700/0x740) from [<c007007c>] (__cond_resched+0x24/0x34)
[<c007007c>] (__cond_resched+0x24/0x34) from [<c05086dc>] (_cond_resched+0x3c/0x44)
[<c05086dc>] (_cond_resched+0x3c/0x44) from [<c0021f6c>] (do_alignment+0x178/0x78c)
[<c0021f6c>] (do_alignment+0x178/0x78c) from [<c00083e0>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98)
[<c00083e0>] (do_DataAbort+0x34/0x98) from [<c0509a60>] (__dabt_svc+0x40/0x60)
Exception stack(0xc0763d70 to 0xc0763db8)
3d60:                                     e97e805e e97e806e 2c000000 11000000
3d80: ea86bb00 0000002c 00000011 e97e807e c076d2a8 e97e805e e97e806e 0000002c
3da0: 3d000000 c0763dbc c04b98fc c02a8490 00000113 ffffffff
[<c0509a60>] (__dabt_svc+0x40/0x60) from [<c02a8490>] (__csum_ipv6_magic+0x8/0xc8)

Fix this by using probe_kernel_address() stead of __get_user().

Reported-by: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: VFP: fix emulation of second VFP instruction 2013-03-14T18:29:41+00:00 Russell King rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk 2013-02-25T16:09:12+00:00 65723919649125f443ecfb2373b00f9febc62c47 commit 5e4ba617c1b584b2e376f31a63bd4e734109318a upstream. Martin Storsjö reports that the sequence: ee312ac1 vsub.f32 s4, s3, s2 ee702ac0 vsub.f32 s5, s1, s0 e59f0028 ldr r0, [pc, #40] ee111a90 vmov r1, s3 on Raspberry Pi (implementor 41 architecture 1 part 20 variant b rev 5) where s3 is a denormal and s2 is zero results in incorrect behaviour - the instruction "vsub.f32 s5, s1, s0" is not executed: VFP: bounce: trigger ee111a90 fpexc d0000780 VFP: emulate: INST=0xee312ac1 SCR=0x00000000 ... As we can see, the instruction triggering the exception is the "vmov" instruction, and we emulate the "vsub.f32 s4, s3, s2" but fail to properly take account of the FPEXC_FP2V flag in FPEXC. This is because the test for the second instruction register being valid is bogus, and will always skip emulation of the second instruction. Reported-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Tested-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 5e4ba617c1b584b2e376f31a63bd4e734109318a upstream.

Martin Storsjö reports that the sequence:

        ee312ac1        vsub.f32        s4, s3, s2
        ee702ac0        vsub.f32        s5, s1, s0
        e59f0028        ldr             r0, [pc, #40]
        ee111a90        vmov            r1, s3

on Raspberry Pi (implementor 41 architecture 1 part 20 variant b rev 5)
where s3 is a denormal and s2 is zero results in incorrect behaviour -
the instruction "vsub.f32 s5, s1, s0" is not executed:

        VFP: bounce: trigger ee111a90 fpexc d0000780
        VFP: emulate: INST=0xee312ac1 SCR=0x00000000
        ...

As we can see, the instruction triggering the exception is the "vmov"
instruction, and we emulate the "vsub.f32 s4, s3, s2" but fail to
properly take account of the FPEXC_FP2V flag in FPEXC.  This is because
the test for the second instruction register being valid is bogus, and
will always skip emulation of the second instruction.

Reported-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Tested-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: 7643/1: sched: correct update_sched_clock() 2013-02-28T14:59:04+00:00 Joonsoo Kim js1304@gmail.com 2013-02-09T04:52:45+00:00 27c303244ef8049be6fd8088230c7f5e02a522b3 commit 7c4e9ced424be4d36df6a3e3825763e97ee97607 upstream. If we want load epoch_cyc and epoch_ns atomically, we should update epoch_cyc_copy first of all. This notify reader that updating is in progress. If we update epoch_cyc first like as current implementation, there is subtle error case. Look at the below example. <Initial Condition> cyc = 9 ns = 900 cyc_copy = 9 == CASE 1 == <CPU A = reader> <CPU B = updater> write cyc = 10 read cyc = 10 read ns = 900 write ns = 1000 write cyc_copy = 10 read cyc_copy = 10 output = (10, 900) == CASE 2 == <CPU A = reader> <CPU B = updater> read cyc = 9 write cyc = 10 write ns = 1000 read ns = 1000 read cyc_copy = 9 write cyc_copy = 10 output = (9, 1000) If atomic read is ensured, output should be (9, 900) or (10, 1000). But, output in example case are not. So, change updating sequence in order to correct this problem. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 7c4e9ced424be4d36df6a3e3825763e97ee97607 upstream.

If we want load epoch_cyc and epoch_ns atomically,
we should update epoch_cyc_copy first of all.
This notify reader that updating is in progress.

If we update epoch_cyc first like as current implementation,
there is subtle error case.
Look at the below example.

<Initial Condition>
cyc = 9
ns = 900
cyc_copy = 9

== CASE 1 ==
<CPU A = reader>           <CPU B = updater>
                           write cyc = 10
read cyc = 10
read ns = 900
                           write ns = 1000
                           write cyc_copy = 10
read cyc_copy = 10

output = (10, 900)

== CASE 2 ==
<CPU A = reader>           <CPU B = updater>
read cyc = 9
                           write cyc = 10
                           write ns = 1000
read ns = 1000
read cyc_copy = 9
                           write cyc_copy = 10
output = (9, 1000)

If atomic read is ensured, output should be (9, 900) or (10, 1000).
But, output in example case are not.

So, change updating sequence in order to correct this problem.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: samsung: fix assembly syntax for new gas 2013-02-28T14:59:04+00:00 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de 2013-01-08T21:58:31+00:00 cae53e2a9a03e53152fdd331067923f7d65fc72e commit 2815774bb38445006074e16251b9ef5123bdc616 upstream. Recent assembler versions complain about extraneous whitespace inside [] brackets. This fixes all of these instances for the samsung platforms. We should backport this to all kernels that might need to be built with new binutils. arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]' arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]' arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]' arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:48: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r7,[ r4 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:49: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r8,[ r5 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:50: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r9,[ r6 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r7,[ r4 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r8,[ r5 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:66: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r9,[ r6 ]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S:33: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr pc,[ r0,#((0x0B8)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000)))]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:60: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r1 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:61: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r1 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:62: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r2 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:63: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r2 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r3 ]' arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r3 ]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]' arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]' Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 2815774bb38445006074e16251b9ef5123bdc616 upstream.

Recent assembler versions complain about extraneous
whitespace inside [] brackets. This fixes all of
these instances for the samsung platforms. We should
backport this to all kernels that might need to
be built with new binutils.

arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:48: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r7,[ r4 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:49: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r8,[ r5 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:50: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r9,[ r6 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r7,[ r4 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r8,[ r5 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:66: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r9,[ r6 ]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S:33: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr pc,[ r0,#((0x0B8)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000)))]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:60: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r1 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:61: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r1 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:62: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r2 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:63: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r2 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r3 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r3 ]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]'

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: PXA3xx: program the CSMSADRCFG register 2013-02-28T14:59:04+00:00 Igor Grinberg grinberg@compulab.co.il 2013-01-13T11:49:47+00:00 76753d39bf46abf7e37df89e2258bef933bb2207 commit d107a204154ddd79339203c2deeb7433f0cf6777 upstream. The Chip Select Configuration Register must be programmed to 0x2 in order to achieve the correct behavior of the Static Memory Controller. Without this patch devices wired to DFI and accessed through SMC cannot be accessed after resume from S2. Do not rely on the boot loader to program the CSMSADRCFG register by programming it in the kernel smemc module. Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit d107a204154ddd79339203c2deeb7433f0cf6777 upstream.

The Chip Select Configuration Register must be programmed to 0x2 in
order to achieve the correct behavior of the Static Memory Controller.

Without this patch devices wired to DFI and accessed through SMC cannot
be accessed after resume from S2.

Do not rely on the boot loader to program the CSMSADRCFG register by
programming it in the kernel smemc module.

Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: 7627/1: Predicate preempt logic on PREEMP_COUNT not PREEMPT alone 2013-02-04T00:24:40+00:00 Stephen Boyd sboyd@codeaurora.org 2013-01-14T18:50:42+00:00 112ae50d212e65816b9de8ea0010a430569d2fc6 commit 568dca15aa2a0f4ddee255894ec393a159f13147 upstream. Patrik Kluba reports that the preempt count becomes invalid due to the preempt_enable() call being unbalanced with a preempt_disable() call in the vfp assembly routines. This happens because preempt_enable() and preempt_disable() update preempt counts under PREEMPT_COUNT=y but the vfp assembly routines do so under PREEMPT=y. In a configuration where PREEMPT=n and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, PREEMPT_COUNT=y and so the preempt_enable() call in VFP_bounce() keeps subtracting from the preempt count until it goes negative. Fix this by always using PREEMPT_COUNT to decided when to update preempt counts in the ARM assembly code. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reported-by: Patrik Kluba <pkluba@dension.com> Tested-by: Patrik Kluba <pkluba@dension.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 568dca15aa2a0f4ddee255894ec393a159f13147 upstream.

Patrik Kluba reports that the preempt count becomes invalid due
to the preempt_enable() call being unbalanced with a
preempt_disable() call in the vfp assembly routines. This happens
because preempt_enable() and preempt_disable() update preempt
counts under PREEMPT_COUNT=y but the vfp assembly routines do so
under PREEMPT=y. In a configuration where PREEMPT=n and
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, PREEMPT_COUNT=y and so the preempt_enable()
call in VFP_bounce() keeps subtracting from the preempt count
until it goes negative.

Fix this by always using PREEMPT_COUNT to decided when to update
preempt counts in the ARM assembly code.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Reported-by: Patrik Kluba <pkluba@dension.com>
Tested-by: Patrik Kluba <pkluba@dension.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ARM: at91: rm9200: remake the BGA as default version 2013-02-04T00:24:40+00:00 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj@jcrosoft.com 2012-12-23T18:07:49+00:00 399f41521ecb4dfb55bf86210864ce7c60157d8a commit 36224d0fe0f34cdde66a381708853ebadeac799c upstream. Make BGA as the default version as we are supposed to just have to specify when we use the PQFP version. Issue was existing since commit: 3e90772 (ARM: at91: fix at91rm9200 soc subtype handling). Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 36224d0fe0f34cdde66a381708853ebadeac799c upstream.

Make BGA as the default version as we are supposed to just have
to specify when we use the PQFP version.

Issue was existing since commit:
3e90772 (ARM: at91: fix at91rm9200 soc subtype handling).

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>