linux-stable.git/arch/arm, branch v3.2.40

ARM: w90x900: fix legacy assembly syntax

2013-03-06T03:24:00+00:00

commit fa5ce5f94c0f2bfa41ba68d2d2524298e1fc405e upstream.

New ARM binutils don't allow extraneous whitespace inside
of brackets, which causes this error on all mach-w90x900
defconfigs:

arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x10C)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x110)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x10C)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x110)]'

This removes the whitespace in order to build the kernel
again.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Cc: Wan ZongShun 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: samsung: fix assembly syntax for new gas

2013-03-06T03:23:59+00:00

commit 2815774bb38445006074e16251b9ef5123bdc616 upstream.

Recent assembler versions complain about extraneous
whitespace inside [] brackets. This fixes all of
these instances for the samsung platforms. We should
backport this to all kernels that might need to
be built with new binutils.

arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:214: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r6,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:430: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r0,[ r6,#(0x14)]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:48: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r7,[ r4 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:49: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r8,[ r5 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:50: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r9,[ r6 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r7,[ r4 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r8,[ r5 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2410.S:66: Error: ARM register expected -- `streq r9,[ r6 ]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r2,#((0x0B0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-((0)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm-h1940.S:33: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr pc,[ r0,#((0x0B8)+(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000))))-(((0x56000000)-(0x50000000))+(0xF6000000+(0x01000000)))]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:60: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r1 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:61: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r1 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:62: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r2 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:63: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r2 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:64: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldrne r9,[ r3 ]'
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/sleep-s3c2412.S:65: Error: ARM register expected -- `strne r9,[ r3 ]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x08)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x18)]'
arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:85: Error: ARM register expected -- `ldr r2,[ r3,#(0x10)]'

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim 
Cc: Ben Dooks 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust filenames]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: PXA3xx: program the CSMSADRCFG register

2013-03-06T03:23:44+00:00

commit d107a204154ddd79339203c2deeb7433f0cf6777 upstream.

The Chip Select Configuration Register must be programmed to 0x2 in
order to achieve the correct behavior of the Static Memory Controller.

Without this patch devices wired to DFI and accessed through SMC cannot
be accessed after resume from S2.

Do not rely on the boot loader to program the CSMSADRCFG register by
programming it in the kernel smemc module.

Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg 
Acked-by: Eric Miao 
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: DMA: Fix struct page iterator in dma_cache_maint() to work with sparsemem

2013-02-06T04:33:39+00:00

commit 15653371c67c3fbe359ae37b720639dd4c7b42c5 upstream.

Subhash Jadavani reported this partial backtrace:
  Now consider this call stack from MMC block driver (this is on the ARMv7
  based board):

  [] (v7_dma_inv_range+0x30/0x48) from [] (dma_cache_maint_page+0x1c4/0x24c)
  [] (dma_cache_maint_page+0x1c4/0x24c) from [] (___dma_page_cpu_to_dev+0x14/0x1c)
  [] (___dma_page_cpu_to_dev+0x14/0x1c) from [] (dma_map_sg+0x3c/0x114)

This is caused by incrementing the struct page pointer, and running off
the end of the sparsemem page array.  Fix this by incrementing by pfn
instead, and convert the pfn to a struct page.

Suggested-by: James Bottomley 
Tested-by: Subhash Jadavani 
Signed-off-by: Russell King 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: 7628/1: head.S: map one extra section for the ATAG/DTB area

2013-02-06T04:33:35+00:00

commit 6f16f4998f98e42e3f2dedf663cfb691ff0324af upstream.

We currently use a temporary 1MB section aligned to a 1MB boundary for
mapping the provided device tree until the final page table is created.
However, if the device tree happens to cross that 1MB boundary, the end
of it remains unmapped and the kernel crashes when it attempts to access
it.  Given no restriction on the location of that DTB, it could end up
with only a few bytes mapped at the end of a section.

Solve this issue by mapping two consecutive sections.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre 
Tested-by: Sascha Hauer 
Tested-by: Tomasz Figa 
Signed-off-by: Russell King 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust context
 - The mapping is not conditional; drop the 'ne' suffixes]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: 7627/1: Predicate preempt logic on PREEMP_COUNT not PREEMPT alone

2013-02-06T04:33:35+00:00

commit 568dca15aa2a0f4ddee255894ec393a159f13147 upstream.

Patrik Kluba reports that the preempt count becomes invalid due
to the preempt_enable() call being unbalanced with a
preempt_disable() call in the vfp assembly routines. This happens
because preempt_enable() and preempt_disable() update preempt
counts under PREEMPT_COUNT=y but the vfp assembly routines do so
under PREEMPT=y. In a configuration where PREEMPT=n and
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, PREEMPT_COUNT=y and so the preempt_enable()
call in VFP_bounce() keeps subtracting from the preempt count
until it goes negative.

Fix this by always using PREEMPT_COUNT to decided when to update
preempt counts in the ARM assembly code.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
Reported-by: Patrik Kluba 
Tested-by: Patrik Kluba 
Signed-off-by: Russell King 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: pxa27x: fix ac97 warm reset

2013-02-06T04:33:26+00:00

commit 3b4bc7bccc7857274705b05cf81a0c72cfd0b0dd upstream.

This patch fixes some code that implements a work-around to a hardware bug in
the ac97 controller on the pxa27x.  A bug in the controller's warm reset
functionality requires that the mfp used by the controller as the AC97_nRESET
line be temporarily reconfigured as a generic output gpio (AF0) and manually
held high for the duration of the warm reset cycle.  This is what was done in
the original code, but it was broken long ago by commit fb1bf8cd
    ([ARM] pxa: introduce processor specific pxa27x_assert_ac97reset())
which changed the mfp to a GPIO input instead of a high output.

The fix requires the ac97 controller to obtain the gpio via gpio_request_one(),
with arguments that configure the gpio as an output initially driven high.

Tested on a palm treo 680 machine.  Reportedly, this broken code only prevents a
warm reset on hardware that lacks a pull-up on the line, which appears to be the
case for me.

Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn 
Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg 
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: missing ->mmap_sem around find_vma() in swp_emulate.c

2013-01-03T03:33:44+00:00

commit 7bf9b7bef881aac820bf1f2e9951a17b09bd7e04 upstream.

find_vma() is *not* safe when somebody else is removing vmas.  Not just
the return value might get bogus just as you are getting it (this instance
doesn't try to dereference the resulting vma), the search itself can get
buggered in rather spectacular ways.  IOW, ->mmap_sem really, really is
not optional here.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Russell King 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: mm: use pteval_t to represent page protection values

2013-01-03T03:33:03+00:00

commit 864aa04cd02979c2c755cb28b5f4fe56039171c0 upstream.

When updating the page protection map after calculating the user_pgprot
value, the base protection map is temporarily stored in an unsigned long
type, causing truncation of the protection bits when LPAE is enabled.
This effectively means that calls to mprotect() will corrupt the upper
page attributes, clearing the XN bit unconditionally.

This patch uses pteval_t to store the intermediate protection values,
preserving the upper bits for 64-bit descriptors.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre 
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ARM: 7566/1: vfp: fix save and restore when running on pre-VFPv3 and CONFIG_VFPv3 set

2013-01-03T03:32:49+00:00

commit 39141ddfb63a664f26d3f42f64ee386e879b492c upstream.

After commit 846a136881b8f73c1f74250bf6acfaa309cab1f2 ("ARM: vfp: fix
saving d16-d31 vfp registers on v6+ kernels"), the OMAP 2430SDP board
started crashing during boot with omap2plus_defconfig:

[    3.875122] mmcblk0: mmc0:e624 SD04G 3.69 GiB
[    3.915954]  mmcblk0: p1
[    4.086639] Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 0 [#1] SMP ARM
[    4.093719] Modules linked in:
[    4.096954] CPU: 0    Not tainted  (3.6.0-02232-g759e00b #570)
[    4.103149] PC is at vfp_reload_hw+0x1c/0x44
[    4.107666] LR is at __und_usr_fault_32+0x0/0x8

It turns out that the context save/restore fix unmasked a latent bug
in commit 5aaf254409f8d58229107b59507a8235b715a960 ("ARM: 6203/1: Make
VFPv3 usable on ARMv6").  When CONFIG_VFPv3 is set, but the kernel is
booted on a pre-VFPv3 core, the code attempts to save and restore the
d16-d31 VFP registers.  These are only present on non-D16 VFPv3+, so
this results in an undefined instruction exception.  The code didn't
crash before commit 846a136 because the save and restore code was
only touching d0-d15, present on all VFP.

Fix by implementing a request from Russell King to add a new HWCAP
flag that affirmatively indicates the presence of the d16-d31
registers:

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135013547905283&w=2

and some feedback from Måns to clarify the name of the HWCAP flag.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley 
Cc: Tony Lindgren 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Dave Martin 
Cc: Måns Rullgård 
Signed-off-by: Russell King 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings