linux-stable.git/arch/arm64/kernel, branch v5.3

Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux

2019-08-16T17:51:47+00:00

Pull arm64 fixes from Catalin Marinas:

 - Don't taint the kernel if CPUs have different sets of page sizes
   supported (other than the one in use).

 - Issue I-cache maintenance for module ftrace trampoline.

* tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux:
  arm64: ftrace: Ensure module ftrace trampoline is coherent with I-side
  arm64: cpufeature: Don't treat granule sizes as strict

arm64: ftrace: Ensure module ftrace trampoline is coherent with I-side

2019-08-16T16:40:03+00:00

The initial support for dynamic ftrace trampolines in modules made use
of an indirect branch which loaded its target from the beginning of
a special section (e71a4e1bebaf7 ("arm64: ftrace: add support for far
branches to dynamic ftrace")). Since no instructions were being patched,
no cache maintenance was needed. However, later in be0f272bfc83 ("arm64:
ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through code") this code was reworked
to output the trampoline instructions directly into the PLT entry but,
unfortunately, the necessary cache maintenance was overlooked.

Add a call to __flush_icache_range() after writing the new trampoline
instructions but before patching in the branch to the trampoline.

Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
Cc: James Morse 
Cc: 
Fixes: be0f272bfc83 ("arm64: ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through code")
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas

arm64: cpufeature: Don't treat granule sizes as strict

2019-08-13T11:56:35+00:00

If a CPU doesn't support the page size for which the kernel is
configured, then we will complain and refuse to bring it online. For
secondary CPUs (and the boot CPU on a system booting with EFI), we will
also print an error identifying the mismatch.

Consequently, the only time that the cpufeature code can detect a
granule size mismatch is for a granule other than the one that is
currently being used. Although we would rather such systems didn't
exist, we've unfortunately lost that battle and Kevin reports that
on his amlogic S922X (odroid-n2 board) we end up warning and taining
with defconfig because 16k pages are not supported by all of the CPUs.

In such a situation, we don't actually care about the feature mismatch,
particularly now that KVM only exposes the sanitised view of the CPU
registers (commit 93390c0a1b20 - "arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64
CPU features from guests"). Treat the granule fields as non-strict and
let Kevin run without a tainted kernel.

Cc: Marc Zyngier 
Reported-by: Kevin Hilman 
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman 
Acked-by: Mark Rutland 
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: changelog updated with KVM sanitised regs commit]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas

Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm

2019-08-09T22:46:29+00:00

Pull kvm fixes from Paolo Bonzini:
 "Bugfixes (arm and x86) and cleanups"

* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm:
  selftests: kvm: Adding config fragments
  KVM: selftests: Update gitignore file for latest changes
  kvm: remove unnecessary PageReserved check
  KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Reevaluate level sensitive interrupts on enable
  KVM: arm: Don't write junk to CP15 registers on reset
  KVM: arm64: Don't write junk to sysregs on reset
  KVM: arm/arm64: Sync ICH_VMCR_EL2 back when about to block
  x86: kvm: remove useless calls to kvm_para_available
  KVM: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  KVM: remove kvm_arch_has_vcpu_debugfs()
  KVM: Fix leak vCPU's VMCS value into other pCPU
  KVM: Check preempted_in_kernel for involuntary preemption
  KVM: LAPIC: Don't need to wakeup vCPU twice afer timer fire
  arm64: KVM: hyp: debug-sr: Mark expected switch fall-through
  KVM: arm64: Update kvm_arm_exception_class and esr_class_str for new EC
  KVM: arm: vgic-v3: Mark expected switch fall-through
  arm64: KVM: regmap: Fix unexpected switch fall-through
  KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce kvm_pmu_vcpu_init() to setup PMU counter index

arm64: kprobes: Recover pstate.D in single-step exception handler

2019-08-02T10:55:50+00:00

kprobes manipulates the interrupted PSTATE for single step, and
doesn't restore it. Thus, if we put a kprobe where the pstate.D
(debug) masked, the mask will be cleared after the kprobe hits.

Moreover, in the most complicated case, this can lead a kernel
crash with below message when a nested kprobe hits.

[  152.118921] Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1

When the 1st kprobe hits, do_debug_exception() will be called.
At this point, debug exception (= pstate.D) must be masked (=1).
But if another kprobes hits before single-step of the first kprobe
(e.g. inside user pre_handler), it unmask the debug exception
(pstate.D = 0) and return.
Then, when the 1st kprobe setting up single-step, it saves current
DAIF, mask DAIF, enable single-step, and restore DAIF.
However, since "D" flag in DAIF is cleared by the 2nd kprobe, the
single-step exception happens soon after restoring DAIF.

This has been introduced by commit 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe:
Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler")

To solve this issue, this stores all DAIF bits and restore it
after single stepping.

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju 
Fixes: 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe: Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler")
Reviewed-by: James Morse 
Tested-by: James Morse 
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers

2019-08-01T14:00:27+00:00

Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception
handlers since we are sure those are not preemptible and
interrupts are off.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney 
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm64: unwind: Prohibit probing on return_address()

2019-08-01T14:00:26+00:00

Prohibit probing on return_address() and subroutines which
is called from return_address(), since the it is invoked from
trace_hardirqs_off() which is also kprobe blacklisted.

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju 
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG}

2019-07-31T17:10:55+00:00

If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.

Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.

Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Cc:  # 4.4.x-
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose 
Acked-by: Mark Rutland 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas

arm64: module: Mark expected switch fall-through

2019-07-29T10:59:36+00:00

When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warnings
was starting to show up:

../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c: In function ‘apply_relocate_add’:
../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:316:19: warning: this statement may fall
 through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    overflow_check = false;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:317:3: note: here
   case R_AARCH64_MOVW_UABS_G0:
   ^~~~
../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:322:19: warning: this statement may fall
 through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    overflow_check = false;
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:323:3: note: here
   case R_AARCH64_MOVW_UABS_G1:
   ^~~~

Rework so that the compiler doesn't warn about fall-through.

Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon

arm64: smp: Mark expected switch fall-through

2019-07-29T10:59:30+00:00

When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warning
was starting to show up:

In file included from ../include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                 from ../include/linux/list.h:9,
                 from ../include/linux/kobject.h:19,
                 from ../include/linux/of.h:17,
                 from ../include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                 from ../include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                 from ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:9:
../arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c: In function ‘__cpu_up’:
../include/linux/printk.h:302:2: warning: this statement may fall
 through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
  printk(KERN_CRIT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:156:4: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_crit’
    pr_crit("CPU%u: may not have shut down cleanly\n", cpu);
    ^~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:157:3: note: here
   case CPU_STUCK_IN_KERNEL:
   ^~~~

Rework so that the compiler doesn't warn about fall-through.

Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon