In commit:

  3b7142752e4bee15 ("arm64: convert native/compat syscall entry to C")

... we moved the syscall invocation code from assembly to C, but left
behind a number of register aliases which are now unused.

Let's remove them before they confuse someone.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Commit 396244692232 ("arm64: preempt: Provide our own implementation of
asm/preempt.h") extended the preempt count field in struct thread_info
to 64 bits, so that it consists of a 32-bit count plus a 32-bit flag
indicating whether or not the current task needs rescheduling.

Whilst the asm-offsets definition of TSK_TI_PREEMPT was updated to point
to this new field, the assembly usage was left untouched meaning that a
32-bit load from TSK_TI_PREEMPT on a big-endian machine actually returns
the reschedule flag instead of the count.

Whilst we could fix this by pointing TSK_TI_PREEMPT at the count field,
we're actually better off reworking the two assembly users so that they
operate on the whole 64-bit value in favour of inspecting the thread
flags separately in order to determine whether a reschedule is needed.

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The comment about SYS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE relying on ERET being
context-synchronizing is confusing and misplaced with kpti. Given that
this is already documented under Documentation/ (see arch-support.txt
for membarrier), remove the comment altogether.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Some CPUs can speculate past an ERET instruction and potentially perform
speculative accesses to memory before processing the exception return.
Since the register state is often controlled by a lower privilege level
at the point of an ERET, this could potentially be used as part of a
side-channel attack.

This patch emits an SB sequence after each ERET so that speculation is
held up on exception return.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

It recently came to light that userspace can execute WFI, and that
the arm64 kernel doesn't trap this event. This sounds rather benign,
but the kernel should decide when it wants to wait for an interrupt,
and not userspace.

Let's trap WFI and immediately return after having skipped the
instruction. This effectively makes WFI a rather expensive NOP.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Instead of directly generating an UNDEF when trapping a CP15 access,
let's add a new entry point to that effect (which only generates an
UNDEF for now).

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Rather than panic() when taking an undefined instruction exception from
EL1, allow a hook to be registered in case we want to emulate the
instruction, like we will for the SSBS PSTATE manipulation instructions.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

This adds support for the STACKLEAK gcc plugin to arm64 by implementing
stackleak_check_alloca(), based heavily on the x86 version, and adding the
two helpers used by the stackleak common code: current_top_of_stack() and
on_thread_stack(). The stack erasure calls are made at syscall returns.
Additionally, this disables the plugin in hypervisor and EFI stub code,
which are out of scope for the protection.

Acked-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We can zero GPRs x0 - x29 upon entry from EL0 to make it harder for
userspace to control values consumed by speculative gadgets.

We don't blat x30, since this is stashed much later, and we'll blat it
before invoking C code.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Now that all of the syscall logic works on the saved pt_regs, apply_ssbd
can safely corrupt x0-x3 in the entry paths, and we no longer need to
restore them. So let's remove the logic doing so.

With that logic gone, we can fold the branch target into the macro, so
that callers need not deal with this. GAS provides \@, which provides a
unique value per macro invocation, which we can use to create a unique
label.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>