linux-stable.git/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S, branch linux-4.15.y Linux kernel stable tree arm64: entry: Apply BP hardening for suspicious interrupts from EL0 2018-02-16T19:06:41+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2018-02-02T17:31:40+00:00 40ad0b937384e4b1c48539557443f4a8f1bc0848 Commit 30d88c0e3ace upstream. It is possible to take an IRQ from EL0 following a branch to a kernel address in such a way that the IRQ is prioritised over the instruction abort. Whilst an attacker would need to get the stars to align here, it might be sufficient with enough calibration so perform BP hardening in the rare case that we see a kernel address in the ELR when handling an IRQ from EL0. Reported-by: Dan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 30d88c0e3ace upstream.

It is possible to take an IRQ from EL0 following a branch to a kernel
address in such a way that the IRQ is prioritised over the instruction
abort. Whilst an attacker would need to get the stars to align here,
it might be sufficient with enough calibration so perform BP hardening
in the rare case that we see a kernel address in the ELR when handling
an IRQ from EL0.

Reported-by: Dan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: entry: Apply BP hardening for high-priority synchronous exceptions 2018-02-16T19:06:41+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2018-02-02T17:31:39+00:00 9444427e9f43132642120fb9104b911cda5c5d8b Commit 5dfc6ed27710 upstream. Software-step and PC alignment fault exceptions have higher priority than instruction abort exceptions, so apply the BP hardening hooks there too if the user PC appears to reside in kernel space. Reported-by: Dan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 5dfc6ed27710 upstream.

Software-step and PC alignment fault exceptions have higher priority than
instruction abort exceptions, so apply the BP hardening hooks there too
if the user PC appears to reside in kernel space.

Reported-by: Dan Hettena <dhettena@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: Add skeleton to harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks 2018-02-16T19:06:40+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2018-01-03T11:17:58+00:00 24f07bba953d16d61929e410bc6c351903af913c Commit 0f15adbb2861 upstream. Aliasing attacks against CPU branch predictors can allow an attacker to redirect speculative control flow on some CPUs and potentially divulge information from one context to another. This patch adds initial skeleton code behind a new Kconfig option to enable implementation-specific mitigations against these attacks for CPUs that are affected. Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Conflicts: arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 0f15adbb2861 upstream.

Aliasing attacks against CPU branch predictors can allow an attacker to
redirect speculative control flow on some CPUs and potentially divulge
information from one context to another.

This patch adds initial skeleton code behind a new Kconfig option to
enable implementation-specific mitigations against these attacks for
CPUs that are affected.

Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: Move post_ttbr_update_workaround to C code 2018-02-16T19:06:40+00:00 Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com 2018-01-02T18:19:39+00:00 e8b634e69ce37e5ab375bfbaa2e5eb6fb05609b9 Commit 95e3de3590e3 upstream. We will soon need to invoke a CPU-specific function pointer after changing page tables, so move post_ttbr_update_workaround out into C code to make this possible. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Conflicts: arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 95e3de3590e3 upstream.

We will soon need to invoke a CPU-specific function pointer after changing
page tables, so move post_ttbr_update_workaround out into C code to make
this possible.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: entry: Ensure branch through syscall table is bounded under speculation 2018-02-16T19:06:39+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2018-02-05T15:34:20+00:00 cf6df3266a9149cca2cf95787558cacd6483da88 Commit 6314d90e6493 upstream. In a similar manner to array_index_mask_nospec, this patch introduces an assembly macro (mask_nospec64) which can be used to bound a value under speculation. This macro is then used to ensure that the indirect branch through the syscall table is bounded under speculation, with out-of-range addresses speculating as calls to sys_io_setup (0). Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 6314d90e6493 upstream.

In a similar manner to array_index_mask_nospec, this patch introduces an
assembly macro (mask_nospec64) which can be used to bound a value under
speculation. This macro is then used to ensure that the indirect branch
through the syscall table is bounded under speculation, with out-of-range
addresses speculating as calls to sys_io_setup (0).

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: Make USER_DS an inclusive limit 2018-02-16T19:06:39+00:00 Robin Murphy robin.murphy@arm.com 2018-02-05T15:34:18+00:00 2a8a65a284c8a8693ae700fbdf2c1a90533a0a48 Commit 51369e398d0d upstream. Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range ending on the very top byte of kernel memory. Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 51369e398d0d upstream.

Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is
inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe
masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough
bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This
also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range
ending on the very top byte of kernel memory.

Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of
addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to
amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we
can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: entry: Reword comment about post_ttbr_update_workaround 2018-02-16T19:06:38+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2018-01-29T11:59:58+00:00 b87b5ce113e1fe1c97b6a589ccc0f591d39287bd Commit f167211a93ac upstream. We don't fully understand the Cavium ThunderX erratum, but it appears that mapping the kernel as nG can lead to horrible consequences such as attempting to execute userspace from kernel context. Since kpti isn't enabled for these CPUs anyway, simplify the comment justifying the lack of post_ttbr_update_workaround in the exception trampoline. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit f167211a93ac upstream.

We don't fully understand the Cavium ThunderX erratum, but it appears
that mapping the kernel as nG can lead to horrible consequences such as
attempting to execute userspace from kernel context. Since kpti isn't
enabled for these CPUs anyway, simplify the comment justifying the lack
of post_ttbr_update_workaround in the exception trampoline.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN 2018-02-16T19:06:37+00:00 Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com 2018-01-10T13:18:30+00:00 e7a062e77db3af4973188853de2f1c27ee08bf7a Commit 6b88a32c7af6 upstream. With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID) when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()). Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the __uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID update in cpu_do_switch_mm(). This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in __uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}. The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID. Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Conflicts: arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit 6b88a32c7af6 upstream.

With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the
active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID)
when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access
was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread
saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()).

Commit 7655abb95386 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a
TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e75711
("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the
reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an
exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will
re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in
cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID
update in cpu_do_switch_mm().

This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and
disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the
EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in
TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}.

The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use
READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.

As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any
existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID.

Fixes: 27a921e75711 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN")
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
	arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: mm: Introduce TTBR_ASID_MASK for getting at the ASID in the TTBR 2018-02-16T19:06:36+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2017-12-01T17:33:48+00:00 7036e5f6774e8bfefc5f3f5c452195a48cef8b26 Commit b519538dfefc upstream. There are now a handful of open-coded masks to extract the ASID from a TTBR value, so introduce a TTBR_ASID_MASK and use that instead. Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit b519538dfefc upstream.

There are now a handful of open-coded masks to extract the ASID from a
TTBR value, so introduce a TTBR_ASID_MASK and use that instead.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arm64: use RET instruction for exiting the trampoline 2018-02-16T19:06:36+00:00 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com 2017-11-14T16:15:59+00:00 feace1c8f6eb780adf8d5b6608186a0a76363f6f Commit be04a6d1126b upstream. Speculation attacks against the entry trampoline can potentially resteer the speculative instruction stream through the indirect branch and into arbitrary gadgets within the kernel. This patch defends against these attacks by forcing a misprediction through the return stack: a dummy BL instruction loads an entry into the stack, so that the predicted program flow of the subsequent RET instruction is to a branch-to-self instruction which is finally resolved as a branch to the kernel vectors with speculation suppressed. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Commit be04a6d1126b upstream.

Speculation attacks against the entry trampoline can potentially resteer
the speculative instruction stream through the indirect branch and into
arbitrary gadgets within the kernel.

This patch defends against these attacks by forcing a misprediction
through the return stack: a dummy BL instruction loads an entry into
the stack, so that the predicted program flow of the subsequent RET
instruction is to a branch-to-self instruction which is finally resolved
as a branch to the kernel vectors with speculation suppressed.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>