Pull pci fixes from Bjorn Helgaas:

 - Update kernel-parameters doc to describe "pcie_aspm=off" more
   accurately (Bjorn Helgaas)

 - Restore the parent's (not the child's) ASPM state to the parent
   during resume, which fixes a reboot during resume (Kai-Heng Feng)

* tag 'pci-v6.9-fixes-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci:
  PCI/ASPM: Restore parent state to parent, child state to child
  PCI/ASPM: Clarify that pcie_aspm=off means leave ASPM untouched

Previously we claimed "pcie_aspm=off" meant that ASPM would be disabled,
which is wrong.

Correct this to say that with "pcie_aspm=off", Linux doesn't touch any ASPM
configuration at all.  ASPM may have been enabled by firmware, and that
will be left unchanged.  See "aspm_support_enabled".

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429191821.691726-1-helgaas@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>

Explicitly disallow enabling mitigations at runtime for kernels that were
built with CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n, as some architectures may omit code
entirely if mitigations are disabled at compile time.

E.g. on x86, a large pile of Kconfigs are buried behind CPU_MITIGATIONS,
and trying to provide sane behavior for retroactively enabling mitigations
is extremely difficult, bordering on impossible.  E.g. page table isolation
and call depth tracking require build-time support, BHI mitigations will
still be off without additional kernel parameters, etc.

  [ bp: Touchups. ]

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420000556.2645001-3-seanjc@google.com

Unlike most other mitigations' "auto" options, spectre_bhi=auto only
mitigates newer systems, which is confusing and not particularly useful.

Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/412e9dc87971b622bbbaf64740ebc1f140bff343.1712813475.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org

While syscall hardening helps prevent some BHI attacks, there's still
other low-hanging fruit remaining.  Don't classify it as a mitigation
and make it clear that the system may still be vulnerable if it doesn't
have a HW or SW mitigation enabled.

Fixes: ec9404e40e8f ("x86/bhi: Add BHI mitigation knob")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5951dae3fdee7f1520d5136a27be3bdfe95f88b.1712813475.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org

Fix up some inaccuracies in the BHI documentation.

Fixes: ec9404e40e8f ("x86/bhi: Add BHI mitigation knob")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c84f7451bfe0dd08543c6082a383f390d4aa7e2.1712813475.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org

Pull x86 mitigations from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Mitigations for the native BHI hardware vulnerabilty:

  Branch History Injection (BHI) attacks may allow a malicious
  application to influence indirect branch prediction in kernel by
  poisoning the branch history. eIBRS isolates indirect branch targets
  in ring0. The BHB can still influence the choice of indirect branch
  predictor entry, and although branch predictor entries are isolated
  between modes when eIBRS is enabled, the BHB itself is not isolated
  between modes.

  Add mitigations against it either with the help of microcode or with
  software sequences for the affected CPUs"

[ This also ends up enabling the full mitigation by default despite the
  system call hardening, because apparently there are other indirect
  calls that are still sufficiently reachable, and the 'auto' case just
  isn't hardened enough.

  We'll have some more inevitable tweaking in the future    - Linus ]

* tag 'nativebhi' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  KVM: x86: Add BHI_NO
  x86/bhi: Mitigate KVM by default
  x86/bhi: Add BHI mitigation knob
  x86/bhi: Enumerate Branch History Injection (BHI) bug
  x86/bhi: Define SPEC_CTRL_BHI_DIS_S
  x86/bhi: Add support for clearing branch history at syscall entry
  x86/syscall: Don't force use of indirect calls for system calls
  x86/bugs: Change commas to semicolons in 'spectre_v2' sysfs file

BHI mitigation mode spectre_bhi=auto does not deploy the software
mitigation by default. In a cloud environment, it is a likely scenario
where userspace is trusted but the guests are not trusted. Deploying
system wide mitigation in such cases is not desirable.

Update the auto mode to unconditionally mitigate against malicious
guests. Deploy the software sequence at VMexit in auto mode also, when
hardware mitigation is not available. Unlike the force =on mode,
software sequence is not deployed at syscalls in auto mode.

Suggested-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

Branch history clearing software sequences and hardware control
BHI_DIS_S were defined to mitigate Branch History Injection (BHI).

Add cmdline spectre_bhi={on|off|auto} to control BHI mitigation:

 auto - Deploy the hardware mitigation BHI_DIS_S, if available.
 on   - Deploy the hardware mitigation BHI_DIS_S, if available,
        otherwise deploy the software sequence at syscall entry and
	VMexit.
 off  - Turn off BHI mitigation.

The default is auto mode which does not deploy the software sequence
mitigation.  This is because of the hardening done in the syscall
dispatch path, which is the likely target of BHI.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

kernel-parameters.txt incorrectly states that workings of
kernel.tracepoint_printk sysctl depends on "tracepoint_printk kernel
cmdline option", this is a bit misleading for new users since the actual
cmdline option name is tp_printk.

Fixes: 0daa2302968c ("tracing: Add tp_printk cmdline to have tracepoints go to printk()")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240323231704.1217926-1-vt@altlinux.org